The purpose of these comments is to provide a further test of the models presented by Mualem and Friedman [1991] using measurement data for Ottawa sands reported by Gorman [1989] and Gorman and Kelly [1990].There have been numerous attempts to relate aquifer electrical properties to aquifer hydraulic properties [Mazac et al., 1985]. In correlations for saturated soils the equivalence of hydraulic and electrical tortuosity does not appear to be the important factor. Attempts to characterize the hydrologic properties of unsaturated soils have been rare IGorman and Kelly, 1990].The similarity of the behavior of the resistivity index and relative permeability with degree of saturation has encouraged researchers to define a theoretical link. The resistivity index is defined as the ratio of the formation factor at partial saturation to the formation factor at complete saturation [Dullien, 1992]. Wyllie and Spangler [1952] suggested that relative permeability could be defined in terms of degree of saturation, the resistivity index, and the capillary desaturation relationship. Wyllie and Gardner [1958], starting with the relative permeability model, showed that the resistivity index should be inversely proportional to the square of saturation. However, Wyllie and Gregory [1953] noted that the exponent I depends on how the saturation is reached.Brutsaert [1967] mentioned the use of electrical measurements for estimating relative permeability, but there has apparently been little research done to develop electrical measurements for this purpose.Laboratory electrical measurements on cohesive soils are comparatively simple, whereas measurements on cohesionless soils are not. As Mualem and Friedman [1991] imply, a general problem with electrical measurement procedures is that they are not standardized and thus key parameters for comparisons and testing of theoretical models are frequently missing.For nonconducting soils or high water conductivities the expression for bulk soil conductivity can be written using equations (5)