2010
DOI: 10.1177/1363460710370655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical polyamory: Some thoughts on loving, thinking, and queering anarchism

Abstract: This article argues that queering anarchism means complexifying it. Concretely, we propose that we can apply some of the ways that we (might) love to the ways that we think about political theory. Thus, we build the metaphor of ‘theoretical polyamory’ to suggest that having multiple partners (or political theories) is a way of constructing more holistic and nuanced movements than might be implied by solely relying on anarchism for the answers to the complex questions surrounding the political project of undoin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I employ a broad definition of queering, and focus here on actions and representations that ‘disturb the order of things’ and that—in making things oblique—open up other ways to inhabit those forms (Ahmed, 2006). Queer theory addresses both the ways that we become ‘constituted as socially viable beings’ (J Butler, 2004: 2) and the many ways that we are denied that social viability through the discursive construction of identities that often function more as cages than descriptors (Shannon and Willis, 2010). Certainly graphic birth imagery, and the normative assumptions about (hetero)sexualized femininity that it indexes, serves to constrain our understanding of appropriate female embodiment.…”
Section: Queering Sexy Birth Depictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I employ a broad definition of queering, and focus here on actions and representations that ‘disturb the order of things’ and that—in making things oblique—open up other ways to inhabit those forms (Ahmed, 2006). Queer theory addresses both the ways that we become ‘constituted as socially viable beings’ (J Butler, 2004: 2) and the many ways that we are denied that social viability through the discursive construction of identities that often function more as cages than descriptors (Shannon and Willis, 2010). Certainly graphic birth imagery, and the normative assumptions about (hetero)sexualized femininity that it indexes, serves to constrain our understanding of appropriate female embodiment.…”
Section: Queering Sexy Birth Depictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there is a healthy discussion of polyamory in academic journals and book chapters, addressing the relationship of polyamory to multiple topics, such as: anarchist theory (e.g. Heckert, 2010;Shannon & Willis, 2010); feminism and women's issues (e.g. Aguilar, 2013;Pallotta-Chiarolli, 2013);…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent debates have emphasized the need for a new progressive politics of love which could entail a broadening beyond the ideal of the romantic couple to encompass the revolutionary couple or the “non‐neighbor” (Žižek ), to enable the “community‐to‐come” (Agamben ), or to promote new polyamorous relationships which would reflect on, and translate into, new politics of non‐domination (Heckert ; Shannon ). More recently, Hardt and Negri () even called for love as the new ground for political emancipation, warning readers against the constant threat of “love gone bad,” which find its clearest expression in the love of one's country leading to fascism (see also Ahmed ).…”
Section: Engaging With Technologies Of Love Beyond Affectmentioning
confidence: 99%