1988
DOI: 10.1118/1.596248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical optimization of a split septaless xenon ionization detector for dual‐energy chest radiography

Abstract: It is proposed that digital scanned projection radiography of the chest be performed by using an energy-sensitive septaless xenon ionization detector (SXID) to obtain dual-energy images. The proposed detector is composed of a front region, sensitive to low-energy x rays, and a rear region, sensitive to high-energy x rays, separated by a suitable filter layer. We have developed a simple, precise theoretical formulation for dual-energy optimization, and applied it to the split SXID. We describe the variation of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods to estimate the fluctuations in g r and t c by considering the measured fluctuations in the log-signals have been previously described. 18,21,33 Briefly, the differentials of the log-signal functions can be expressed as the linear combination of the differentials of g r and t c to give…”
Section: Coefficients Of the Inverse-mapping Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods to estimate the fluctuations in g r and t c by considering the measured fluctuations in the log-signals have been previously described. 18,21,33 Briefly, the differentials of the log-signal functions can be expressed as the linear combination of the differentials of g r and t c to give…”
Section: Coefficients Of the Inverse-mapping Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the front-back with a filter, the filter material was assumed to also be NaI, as in Cardinal and Fenster where the filter layer was composed of the same material as the detector. 10 Part of the total 5 g/cm 2 of the detector was assigned to be the filter ͑i.e., the filter is essentially an inactive NaI cell͒. The optimal apportionment of the total thickness was 0.08 g/cm 2 for the front cell, 0.11 g/cm 2 for the filter, and 4.81 g/cm 2 for the back cell.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single x-ray exposure can be used with a frontback detector, and its performance can be improved with the incorporation of a filter layer between the two cells. [9][10][11][12][13][14] While this method is simpler to implement, its precision is inferior to that of the dual kVp approach for the same dose. 15 Alternatively, consider a detector in which the energy deposited could be measured as a function of depth in the detector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is given by SNR== (6) The log-normalized signal strengths will be given [27] by the ratio of the moments -in Thus the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is given by SNR== (6) The log-normalized signal strengths will be given [27] by the ratio of the moments -in…”
Section: Dual-energy Radiographymentioning
confidence: 99%