2000
DOI: 10.2172/1216249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical minimum energies to produce steel for selected conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy consumption through the integrated process was estimated to be 10.5 to 11.5 GJ/tls (tonne liquid steel), which is ~80% higher than that by EAF route (2.1 to 2.4 GJ/tls) [2] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The energy consumption through the integrated process was estimated to be 10.5 to 11.5 GJ/tls (tonne liquid steel), which is ~80% higher than that by EAF route (2.1 to 2.4 GJ/tls) [2] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…HHVs of the natural gas and hydrogen were used for this calculation. e From Fruehan et al 2 and Stubbles. The energy balance for an average blast furnace operation was calculated using published material balance data and applying the same method of calculating energy values as for the flash ironmaking process.…”
Section: Energy Balances For Ironmaking Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy cost and CO 2 output per tonne of steel has, during the last two decades, been reduced by nearly 30%. However, the differences between the actual and theoretical minimum in consumption of energy and output of CO 2 are still significant [30]. Nearly 4 GJ tonne −1 steel or a 30% reduction in energy (or associated output of CO 2 ) can be saved in iron and steel making alone.…”
Section: Lightermentioning
confidence: 99%