Comprehensive Handbook of Psychological Assessment 2003
DOI: 10.1002/9780471726753.ch8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical, Methodological, and Validational Bases of the Halstead‐Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
122
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
122
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Neuropsychological tests were selected on the basis of their ability to assess domains of cognitive functioning known to decline with age, including (1) spatial reasoning (Block Design and Matrix Reasoning subtests from the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) (Coorporation, 1999; Wechsler, 1997a)), (2) working memory (Digit Span subtest from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – III (Wechsler, 1997a)) and the Spatial Span subtest from the Wechsler Memory Scale-III (Wechsler, 1997b)), (3) visuomotor processing speed (Part A of the Trail Making Test (Reitan, 1985), and the Stroop Color-Word Test (Golden, 1978)), (4) verbal proficiency (Vocabulary and Similarities subtests from the WASI), (5) verbal learning and memory (Four Word Short-Term Memory Test (Kobayashi et al, 2010) and the Rey Verbal Learning Test (Rey, 1958)), and (6) executive function (the Trail Making Test (Reitan, 1985) and the Stroop Color-Word Test (Golden, 1978)). See Supplementary Material for details regarding neuropsychological testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neuropsychological tests were selected on the basis of their ability to assess domains of cognitive functioning known to decline with age, including (1) spatial reasoning (Block Design and Matrix Reasoning subtests from the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) (Coorporation, 1999; Wechsler, 1997a)), (2) working memory (Digit Span subtest from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – III (Wechsler, 1997a)) and the Spatial Span subtest from the Wechsler Memory Scale-III (Wechsler, 1997b)), (3) visuomotor processing speed (Part A of the Trail Making Test (Reitan, 1985), and the Stroop Color-Word Test (Golden, 1978)), (4) verbal proficiency (Vocabulary and Similarities subtests from the WASI), (5) verbal learning and memory (Four Word Short-Term Memory Test (Kobayashi et al, 2010) and the Rey Verbal Learning Test (Rey, 1958)), and (6) executive function (the Trail Making Test (Reitan, 1985) and the Stroop Color-Word Test (Golden, 1978)). See Supplementary Material for details regarding neuropsychological testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The battery included measures of processing speed, short-term memory, executive function, semantic memory, and long-term memory. The following tests were administered: forward and backward digit span and verbal list learning from the Memory Assessment Scale battery (Williams, 1991), Trail Making tests A and B (Reitan and Wolfson, 1985), the Controlled Oral Word Association test (“FAS”) (Benton, 1994), Symmetry Span (Unsworth et al, 2005), Running Letter Span (Unsworth et al, 2005), and Digit/Symbol Substitution (Wechsler, 1997). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The battery of neuropsychological tests administered to the initial 17 younger and 17 older participants comprised standard measures of verbal intellectual ability (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Third Edition (WAIS-III) Vocabulary and Similarities, Wechsler, 1997); anterograde memory (Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (AVLT), Rey, 1941; Wechsler Memory Scale–Third Edition (WMS-III) Verbal Paired Associates and Visual Reproductions, Wechsler, 1997); language (Token Test, McNeil & Prescott, 1978; Boston Naming Test, Goodglass et al, 2000); executive functioning (Trail Making Tests A and B, Reitan and Wolfson, 1985); and depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition, Beck et al, 1996). We also administered the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire (Douglas et al, 2000), as a measure of perceived communication competence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%