2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical investigation of the role of the RANK–RANKL–OPG system in bone remodeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
109
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
109
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we give a summary of the bone cell population models developed by our group (Pivonka, Zimak et al 2008;Pivonka, Zimak et al 2010;Buenzli, Pivonka et al 2012). The presented model takes into account the RANK-RANKL-OPG signalling pathway between bone cells, the action of TGF-on different types of bone cells and pre-osteoblast proliferation.…”
Section: Bone Cell Population Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we give a summary of the bone cell population models developed by our group (Pivonka, Zimak et al 2008;Pivonka, Zimak et al 2010;Buenzli, Pivonka et al 2012). The presented model takes into account the RANK-RANKL-OPG signalling pathway between bone cells, the action of TGF-on different types of bone cells and pre-osteoblast proliferation.…”
Section: Bone Cell Population Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A close inspection of century-long chemical investigations clearly shows that there is a large variety of compositions, ranging all the way from (almost) unmineralized osteoid in early deposition stages, to tissues consisting mainly of hydroxyapatite [Hammett, 1925;Lees et al, 1995]. To somehow simplify this truly complicated matter, one might hope for general inherent 'rules', quantifying natural relationships between constituent concentrations stemming from the sophistically orchestrated activity of biological cells, hormones, and growth factors [Lemaire et al, 2004;Gajjeraman et al, 2007;Filvaroff and Derynck, 1998;Pivonka et al, 2010]. RECALLING, FROM [RIEDL, 1978] ULM, 2003;HÖHLING, 1969;LANDIS ET AL., 1996]].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lactose operon and its feedback regulation are historically famous in mathematical modeling (Vilar et al, 2003;Wong et al, 1997;Yildirim and Mackey, 2003). Besides the aforementioned classical usages of dynamic modeling in systems biology, many other targets have been dynamically analyzed by mathematical modeling, such as calcium homeostasis (Peterson and Riggs, 2010;Raposo et al, 2002), calcium metabolic changes due to perturbations , specific types of cells including bone cells (Komarova, 2005;Lemaire et al, 2004;Pivonka et al, 2010) and mammary gland cells (Hanigan and Baldwin, 1994), lignin biosynthesis in plants (Faraji et al, 2015;, and population dynamics with consideration of climate (Park et al, 2014;Poutsma et al, 2008;Sutherst and Maywald, 1985).…”
Section: Types Of Analyses In Mechanistic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interesting point was that they developed differential equations for the action of regulators based on the binding reaction scheme. A similar theoretical model was developed to investigate the role of RANK-RANKL-OPG pathway in detail (Pivonka et al, 2010). In recent years, the models by Lemaire et al (2002) and Pivonka et al (2010) were expanded upon by embedding the insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-1) that had been indicated as an another critical factor for regulating bone cell interactions, particularly during adolescence (Lee and Okos, 2016).…”
Section: Types Of Model Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%