2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.109098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical investigation of electron impact on formyl fluoride (HFCO)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure , a comparison is made between the total ionization cross section for e-C 3 H 4 N 2 scattering using two methods: the complex scattering potential ionization contribution (CSP-ic) method developed by our group and the binary encounter Bethe (BEB) method developed by Kim and Rudd . These two methods are well known to calculate the ionization cross section and have been extensively described in previous literature and references therein. As such, a detailed description of these methods is not included in this paper.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Figure , a comparison is made between the total ionization cross section for e-C 3 H 4 N 2 scattering using two methods: the complex scattering potential ionization contribution (CSP-ic) method developed by our group and the binary encounter Bethe (BEB) method developed by Kim and Rudd . These two methods are well known to calculate the ionization cross section and have been extensively described in previous literature and references therein. As such, a detailed description of these methods is not included in this paper.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This discrepancy can be attributed to the different approximations employed by the two methods. Specifically, the CSP-ic method extracts the total ionization cross section from the total inelastic cross section via the dynamic ratio, whereas the BEB method incorporates the individual molecular orbital contributions to the total ionization cross section.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%