2021
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.202100216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical Insights into the Formation Mechanism of Methane, Ethylene and Methanol in Fischer‐Tropsch Synthesis at Co2C Surfaces

Abstract: Fischer‐Tropsch synthesis (FTS) is an attractive opportunity to prepare fuels and chemicals, avoiding fossil resources exploration. Co2C was recently demonstrated to exhibit outstanding properties in Fischer‐Tropsch to olefins (FTO) reaction, inhibiting methane formation. However, the exact mechanisms have not been entirely revealed yet. Here we are proposing a study combining DFT calculations and microkinetic modelling (MKM) in order to unveil the dominant reaction pathways of three products of interest in FT… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, it was predicted that the selectivity towards jet fuel (C 8 –C 16 ) at the RNC catalyst would be greater in comparison to the FTS products, in particular, liquid fuels. Besides, from a thermodynamic point of view, methane is the most probable product in FTS, which is according to the reports by Davies et al and Zaffran et al , 47,48 and the Δ G results that were extracted from MD computations confirm this. The MD simulation results illustrate that Δ G for methane formation, 0.29 and 0.26 kcal mol −1 in NC and RNC catalysts, respectively, have the lowest values and Ru boosts its formation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Hence, it was predicted that the selectivity towards jet fuel (C 8 –C 16 ) at the RNC catalyst would be greater in comparison to the FTS products, in particular, liquid fuels. Besides, from a thermodynamic point of view, methane is the most probable product in FTS, which is according to the reports by Davies et al and Zaffran et al , 47,48 and the Δ G results that were extracted from MD computations confirm this. The MD simulation results illustrate that Δ G for methane formation, 0.29 and 0.26 kcal mol −1 in NC and RNC catalysts, respectively, have the lowest values and Ru boosts its formation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Fu et al theoretically predicted a higher concentration of CH 2 * than CH* and CH 3 * over the ZnO surface . Zaffran and Yang reported a lowest energy barrier for CH 2 –CH 2 coupling among CH x –CH x ( x = 0–3) couplings over Co 2 C . Ohta et al showed ready coupling of two ground-state methylene without a barrier …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing reaction temperature decreased methanol selectivity while increasing the ethanol content. Zaffran et al [67] reported the formation mechanism of methanol in FTS at Co 2 C surfaces using combined density functional theory and microkinetic modeling. Density functional theory modeling was employed for vibrational calculations, and it suggests that (101) and (111) facets are more favorable to methanol formation.…”
Section: Methanol Production Through Fermentationmentioning
confidence: 99%