2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c09740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical Insights into Nitrogen-Doped Graphene-Supported Fe, Co, and Ni as Single-Atom Catalysts for CO2 Reduction Reaction

Abstract: Using single-atom catalysts for the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide is a promising method for excess renewable electricity as chemical energy in fuels. In this study, we have investigated single non-noble metal atoms supported on nitrogen-doped graphene (M-N4@Gr, where M = Fe, Co, Ni) as catalysts for the electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 using first-principles density functional theory and the computational hydrogen electrode model. The results show that HCOOH is the preferred product of CO2 reduc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After identified the physical meaning of the ΔΩ­(eV)– U (V) slope, we also calculated the HER competition upon other reported heterogeneous catalysts, ,,, including Cu(211), Ag(110), iron doped in 2D phthalocyanine (Fe-Pc), cobalt in 2D porphyrin (Co–Pr), and cobalt doped in nitrogen-doped (4N) graphene (Co-Gra@N4), shown in Figure b and Figure S9. Generally, larger electron transfer can be observed in *H formation (larger (ΔΩ– U ) slope) than CO 2 chemisorption; thus, these catalysts will show the coverage crossover as discussed above, HER will also completely suppress CO 2 RR at high applied potential, the current dilemma of realization of industrial electrocatalytic CO 2 RR.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After identified the physical meaning of the ΔΩ­(eV)– U (V) slope, we also calculated the HER competition upon other reported heterogeneous catalysts, ,,, including Cu(211), Ag(110), iron doped in 2D phthalocyanine (Fe-Pc), cobalt in 2D porphyrin (Co–Pr), and cobalt doped in nitrogen-doped (4N) graphene (Co-Gra@N4), shown in Figure b and Figure S9. Generally, larger electron transfer can be observed in *H formation (larger (ΔΩ– U ) slope) than CO 2 chemisorption; thus, these catalysts will show the coverage crossover as discussed above, HER will also completely suppress CO 2 RR at high applied potential, the current dilemma of realization of industrial electrocatalytic CO 2 RR.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the interaction between the adsorbate (PMS) and iron center, delocalized electrons accepted by 3d orbitals of Fe from the ligand are further back-donated to the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital. 62 The adsorbed PMS are therefore activated for the generation of radicals by accepting the electrons. For an in-depth assessment of the synergism between the iron center and ligands for spontaneous Fe III /Fe II redox cycling, the ligand-field theory was employed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NiPc functionalized with NH 2 , a representative electron-donating group, shows improved adsorption of CO 2 at active sites and better CO 2 reduction efficiency of 99.8% compared with the pristine NiPc. The functional group donates electrons to the Ni center with an interior inductive effect, leading to a higher degree of electron localization [30,31]. The primary step for the CO 2 RR is the reduction from CO 2 to CO.…”
Section: Effect Of Electron Donors and Acceptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%