2020
DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2020.1833844
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical foundations of phenomenography: a critical review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no rigid criterion in the literature for determining sufficient demonstrations of these validity measures. However, communicative validity is based on the relevant research communities judging the persuasiveness of the methods and findings, and pragmatic validity describes the extent to which useful insights from the findings can be applied to teaching and learning ( Van Rossum and Hamer, 2010 ; Hajar, 2020 ). Throughout the iterative coding process, preliminary aspects, variations, and outcome spaces were presented to different communities of researchers in STEM and education.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no rigid criterion in the literature for determining sufficient demonstrations of these validity measures. However, communicative validity is based on the relevant research communities judging the persuasiveness of the methods and findings, and pragmatic validity describes the extent to which useful insights from the findings can be applied to teaching and learning ( Van Rossum and Hamer, 2010 ; Hajar, 2020 ). Throughout the iterative coding process, preliminary aspects, variations, and outcome spaces were presented to different communities of researchers in STEM and education.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study employs a phenomenographic approach. It is a qualitative approach which aims at discerning people's different ways of understanding a certain phenomenon (Åkerlind, 2012;Hajar, 2021;Marton, 1981). Adopting a non-dualistic ontology stance, the focus of phenomenography is neither on the phenomenon itself nor the individual's experiences on a particular phenomenon.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another basic tenet of phenomenography also acknowledges second-order perspective rather than first-order perspective (Hajar, 2021;Marton, 1981;Marton & Pong, 2005). Marton (1981) explains that instead of investigating a phenomenon from a researcher's point of view (first-order perspective), a phenomenographer explores individuals' conceptions about a particular phenomenon that they have experienced (second-order perspective).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenomenographic Support Needs Interviews were chosen to explore the relationship between the subjective (inner world of the caregiver) and objective (activities involved in supporting a young person on the spectrum within their usual contexts) as the central phenomenon [ 33 ]. This approach directs the researcher in reflecting on the various descriptions gathered from the participants, forming a more holistic awareness of the phenomenon and its meaning [ 33 , 34 ], delivering a second order perspective where the phenomenon “ is described as it is understood rather than as it is ” [ 33 ] (p. 1425). This study was undertaken in the context of a larger research program on Reliability, Validity and Usability of Assessment of Functioning Tools for Autism and Neurodevelopmental Conditions in the Australian Context.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%