Practical Design and Application of Model Predictive Control 2018
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-813918-9.00002-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical Foundation of MPC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, the embedded solver of the Matlab MPC toolbox was chosen [26,27]. To compensate for the control delay due to the digital implementation, a one-step state prediction is applied before the QP solver is called [28].…”
Section: Quadratic Optimization Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, the embedded solver of the Matlab MPC toolbox was chosen [26,27]. To compensate for the control delay due to the digital implementation, a one-step state prediction is applied before the QP solver is called [28].…”
Section: Quadratic Optimization Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve the QP with linear inequality constraints (10), any standard QP solver can be utilized. In this work, the embedded solver of the Matlab MPC toolbox [34,35] was chosen. To compensate the control delay due to the digital implementation, a one-step prediction is executed before the QP solver is called.…”
Section: H Continuous-control-set Model Predictive Flux Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the varying required number of iteration steps for the utilized embedded active-set solver, cf. [34,35], to find the optimum of the QP (10). In simulations and experiments it has been observed that not more than 11 iterations are required to find the optimum [7].…”
Section: Experimental Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, in the optimizer’s cost functional algorithm, the current controller utilizes just output reference tracking and modifications in manipulated variables. Generally, MPC can control the process with these two cost functions satisfactorily . These cost functions are resolved via an online optimization approach to deliver the trajectory of the controller output.…”
Section: Development Of Online Safety Control Using Mpcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, MPC can control the process with these two cost functions satisfactorily. 45 These cost functions are resolved via an online optimization approach to deliver the trajectory of the controller output. The selection of the process model type is the primary factor that distinguishes nonlinear MPC (NMPC) from linear MPC (LMPC).…”
Section: Development Of Online Safety Control Using Mpcmentioning
confidence: 99%