2001
DOI: 10.1021/jp001303i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical Estimation of Lithium Isotopic Reduced Partition Function Ratio for Lithium Ions in Aqueous Solution

Abstract: The reduced partition function ratio for lithium ions in an aqueous solution is derived from the extrapolation of the values of the reduced partition function ratio (r values can be calculated from the normal vibration frequencies according to Bigeleisen and Mayer's theory. To obtain the values of f n r , the normal vibration frequency calculations were carried out for optimized structures of [Li(H 2 O) n ] + (n ) 1-6) using the RHF/6-31+G(d), RHF/6-31++G(d,p), RHF/6-311+G(d) and MP2/6-31+G(d) methods by means… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
50
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
9
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to our results, the Li fractionation between illite and water at 300°C is ϳ6‰ larger than indicated by the empirical work (more negative ␦ 7 Li in the solid). An equation with the same slope as the empirically derived fractionation would nicely tie our datum with calculations of Li isotope fractionation between tetrahedral (aqueous) and octahedral (clay) coordinated lithium species based on reduced partition function ratios (Oi et al, Yamaji et al, 2001) supporting ␣ values of 0.976 at 25°C. The difference of Ϫ6‰ between our experimental results and the empirical data from marine sediments may be due to the crystal size effect and/or incomplete removal of interlayer Li, which would make bulk clay ␦ 7 Li analyses more positive.…”
Section: Lithium Isotope Fractionationsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…According to our results, the Li fractionation between illite and water at 300°C is ϳ6‰ larger than indicated by the empirical work (more negative ␦ 7 Li in the solid). An equation with the same slope as the empirically derived fractionation would nicely tie our datum with calculations of Li isotope fractionation between tetrahedral (aqueous) and octahedral (clay) coordinated lithium species based on reduced partition function ratios (Oi et al, Yamaji et al, 2001) supporting ␣ values of 0.976 at 25°C. The difference of Ϫ6‰ between our experimental results and the empirical data from marine sediments may be due to the crystal size effect and/or incomplete removal of interlayer Li, which would make bulk clay ␦ 7 Li analyses more positive.…”
Section: Lithium Isotope Fractionationsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…It is seen that our values for lithium isotopes are close to the first set of results calculated by Yamaji et al (2001) or fall between their two sets. The same refers to β factors for magnesium and calcium isotopes, which are compared with results of Rustad et al (2010).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…They also tried to calculate this equilibrium constant from statistical thermodynamics, but their value was evidently too large (1.29-1.33). Theoretical estimation of lithium isotopic reduced partition function ratio for lithium ions in aqueous solution were made by Yamaji et al (2001), who report their ab initio results for only one temperature (298 K): their maximum value of lithium isotope fractionation factor between hydrated ion and "Li + exchanger" is 1.07.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aqueous fluids are usually thought to contain four-fold coordinated Li(H 2 O) 4 + -clusters (Yamaji et al, 2001;Ikeda et al, 2007). However, the assumption that Li(H 2 O) 4 + -clusters are the main lithium species in such fluids is based on theoretical calculations at ambient conditions (Yamaji et al, 2001;Ikeda et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the assumption that Li(H 2 O) 4 + -clusters are the main lithium species in such fluids is based on theoretical calculations at ambient conditions (Yamaji et al, 2001;Ikeda et al, 2007). It is unclear to what extent different cluster types with e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%