Theoretical (Dis-) position and Strategic Leitmotivs in Constitutional Interpretation in South Africa

Abstract

This essay takes a look at the historic restoration that bequeathed this country and its people a prototypical, justiciable Constitution. The advent of constitutional democracy in South Africa went hand in hand with an about-turn in the interpretation of enacted law-texts (including the Constitution) and a critical interrogation of certain dominant beliefs about the interpretation of law in general and enacted law in particular. Hitherto mostly unnamed or unlabelled (but not entirely alien) interpretive strategies pursued and developed by users of the Constitution are discussed, concentrating mainly on the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court. Central to the author's approach is an acknowledgement of the decisive actuality of an interpreter's theoretical position becoming visible through (interpretive) leitmotivs. These recur as keynote or defining ideas, motifs or topoi lending direction to specific instances of construing law. Four leitmotivs pertinent to certain constellations of events in constitutional interpretation are discussed and their applicability and utility assessed, drawing on examples from constitutional case-law. The leitmotivs are: (i) transitional constitutionalism; (ii) transformative constitutionalism; (iii) monumental constitutionalism; and (iv) memorial constitutionalism. (i) and (ii) belong together as (A) programmatic leitmotivs and (iii) and (iv) as (B) commemorative leitmotivs. The author concludes that, although scouting out and engaging with leitmotivs call for profound reading and for text analysis of a sort with which "logical" jurists are not always too comfortable, the said endeavours have the potential to be exceptionally rewarding.

Methodological Considerations in the Professional Accreditation Research

“…The way practices evolve requires research, and the informal legal prescript interpretive process has been shown to account for substantive legal meanings (Stappert, 2020). In a way, the PI can be a form of document content analysis that refers to the "grammatical, systematic, teleological, and historical examination of the legislation" (Kommers, 1989, p. 49;Du Plessis, 2015Perulli, 2020. The communicative contents of different utterances of sentences can vary and require interpretation within a specified context (Fallon, 2019).…”

Beyond Expropriation Without Compensation

“…The focus is on the conversations that were had, which can give a glimpse into the type of justice envisioned. Then, focusing on specific submissions, the chapter applies the different notions of justice to ascertain if there is a certain leitmotiv (Du Plessis, 2015) of 'just and equitable'. A case is then made to consider transformative justice as a theory that informs the 'just' in 'just and equitable'.…”

The ‘Justice’ in ‘Just and Equitable’ Compensation

“…The focus is on the conversations that were had, which can give a glimpse into the type of justice envisioned. Then, focusing on specific submissions, the chapter applies the different notions of justice to ascertain if there is a certain leitmotiv (Du Plessis, 2015) of 'just and equitable'. A case is then made to consider transformative justice as a theory that informs the 'just' in 'just and equitable'.…”