Theoretical Development: Specialism, Achievement, Coordination, (SAC) Model – Kantian Perspective

Fascia, Michael; Sanderson, Mike; Tan, Hock; Fascia, Sonny

doi:10.2139/ssrn.3335157

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 54 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…From an innovative point of view therefore, it is relatively straightforward to explain why structured decision making in an innovative healthcare setting becomes important, and why the development of a deliberate strategy is particularly barrier laden and difficult (Fascia, M., Sanderson, M., Tan, H., & Fascia, S. 2019). Examining these barriers, Herzlinger (2006) highlights three main types of health care innovation and the six forces (problematic issues) which affect them.…”

Section: The Inevitability For Improvementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Barnett & Carter, 2015;Storey & Barnett, 2000). A cumulative viewpoint therefore allows an individual's past experiences of the organisation to be related to 'meaningful' knowledge from the organisations point of view (Fascia et al 2019). As such, experiences can contribute to the retaining of knowledge, and resources, which contribute to the current position of understanding and underpins aspects of competitiveness.…”

Section: Figure 1 -Innovation As a Singular Enablermentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Innovation as a Singular Enabler

Fascia

2019

SSRN Journal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: The Inevitability For Improvementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Figure 1 -Innovation As a Singular Enablermentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovation as a Singular Enabler

Fascia

2019

SSRN Journal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Working Paper Series: Innovation Enablers

Fascia¹

2019

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we consider the value of knowledge in an innovation context and deliberate a contrary perspective from existing empiricisms to bring about better innovation efficiency within multi-agent arenas. To do this, we consider why, if innovation is key for developmental trajectories in a healthcare environment, and despite the resource utilised to examine its characteristics, the transfer of knowledge within healthcare, practitioner or organisational innovation domains remains a problematic event.We reflect on this duality with a doxastic attitude and draw on modal maps as underpinning structures to present a critique. Furthermore, we draw from these qualitative descriptions of conditional maps as a natural extension of contemporary KBF (Knowledge Belief Frame) models. Thus, from an innovation context, we can deliberate the parallelism between an agent who establishes belief in real time propositions, and a formal system from which they derive the proposition and reality. Uniquely, in doing so we build a legitimate frame of reference by highlighting managerial parallelisms, which synthesise key epistemic doyennes and, efficaciously underpin the plausibility of logical associations and decision-making drawn from a first-person architype of belief.

show abstract

Theoretical Development: Specialism, Achievement, Coordination, (SAC) Model – Kantian Perspective

Cited by 2 publications

References 54 publications

Innovation as a Singular Enabler

Innovation as a Singular Enabler

Working Paper Series: Innovation Enablers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About