1999
DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1999.0906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical Considerations of Cross-immunity, Recombination and the Evolution of New Parasitic Strains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is also clear that important changes in system dynamics can proceed from specific changes at the level of the parameter values themselves. For instance, in accord with Tanaka and Feldman (1999), we note that changes in recombination rate affect the success of an invading genotype primarily by affecting the magnitude of the advantage or disadvantage conferred by its position in a particular crossreactivity (interference) structure. In broad terms, our results support the conclusions of several other recent modelers, in particular that immune-mediated relationships among genotypes may shape and be shaped by P. falciparum evolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, it is also clear that important changes in system dynamics can proceed from specific changes at the level of the parameter values themselves. For instance, in accord with Tanaka and Feldman (1999), we note that changes in recombination rate affect the success of an invading genotype primarily by affecting the magnitude of the advantage or disadvantage conferred by its position in a particular crossreactivity (interference) structure. In broad terms, our results support the conclusions of several other recent modelers, in particular that immune-mediated relationships among genotypes may shape and be shaped by P. falciparum evolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A variety of mathematical models for coinfections with multiple specific diseases, such as HIV/TB [43, 48, 6, 47], HIV/gonorrhea [40], HIV/malaria [1, 39], malaria and meningitis [29], general diseases [5, 7, 35, 28], and microparasites (viruses, bacteria, protozoa, fungi) [54, 10, 3, 4, 61], have been developed and analyzed in the past few years. Ferguson et al [16] and Kawaguchi et al [27] presented models to describe the coinfection of two serotypes of dengue virus in a human community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to the interaction between nonspecific agents or pathogens, Blyuss and Kyrychko [7] studied a two-disease SIS model with equal transmission efficiency for both susceptible and singly infected individuals; Allen et al [5] studied an SI model for a single host population with two viral infections, in which one is vertically transmitted and the other is horizontally transmitted; Zhang et al [60] proposed an ODEs coinfection model with two strains of parasites and two host types to study the influence of heterogeneities in parasite virulence and host life history on the persistence and spread of parasite strains; Martcheva and Pilyugin [35] considered an epidemic model of two diseases: a primary disease and a secondary disease, structured by time since infection structure (for the primary disease); in the monograph of Keeling and Rohani [28], the interaction of two pathogens spreading through a host population was discussed in four cases: complete cross-immunity, no cross-immunity, enhanced susceptibility and partial cross-immunity. Among these models either the uninfected hosts cannot become infected with both diseases/strains directly [38, 35, 28, 10], or there is no recovery and an infection is lifelong [54, 5, 4], or both [60, 3]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The picture becomes more complicated under super-infection and coinfection [64,20,43,18,33,57,77,36,83,31, and references therein], under incomplete cross-immunity [5,7,47,66,74,27], or under (frequent) mutation, recombination, or within-host evolution of the parasite [33,70,79,83,31, and references therein]. The competition between several strains is also influenced by host population structure in the form of partnerships, kinships, or other social structures [33, and references therein], by spatial structure in the form of nearest neighborhood infection or patchiness [51,24], community structure [8], or, in macro-parasitic diseases, by the mode of parasite reproduction [76].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%