2017
DOI: 10.30525/2256-0742/2017-3-5-221-228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical and Legal Perspective on Certain Types of Legal Liability in Cryptocurrency Relations

Abstract: The aim of this article is to study the theoretical, methodological, and legal possibilities of application of certain types of legal responsibility to the relations, which are connected with cryptocurrency (bitcoin). Some types of liability in the field of cryptocurrency relations make the subject of the study. Methodology. The research is based on a comparison of legal regulation of the sphere of cryptocurrency in Ukraine and in foreign countries. Advantages and disadvantages of different modes of cryptocurr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, one of the main risks is almost no legal protection of the rights of citizens in case of committing offenses against them in this sphere (Drozd et al, 2017); -third, the use of cryptocurrency may entail a number of negative consequences for the state, in particular: 1) taking into account the peculiarity of using cryptocurrency (such as anonymity, etc. ), it is possible to "launder" money gained criminally; 2) a person can withdraw money from Ukraine, avoiding payment of taxes and other obligatory payments; 3) payment of income tax, which individuals receive from cryptocurrency transactions, is undeveloped; -fourth, the essence of cryptocurrency (for example, Bitcoin) is a kind of start-up, and that is why it is difficult to predict its further development.…”
Section: Current Legal Status Of Cryptocurrency In Ukrainementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, one of the main risks is almost no legal protection of the rights of citizens in case of committing offenses against them in this sphere (Drozd et al, 2017); -third, the use of cryptocurrency may entail a number of negative consequences for the state, in particular: 1) taking into account the peculiarity of using cryptocurrency (such as anonymity, etc. ), it is possible to "launder" money gained criminally; 2) a person can withdraw money from Ukraine, avoiding payment of taxes and other obligatory payments; 3) payment of income tax, which individuals receive from cryptocurrency transactions, is undeveloped; -fourth, the essence of cryptocurrency (for example, Bitcoin) is a kind of start-up, and that is why it is difficult to predict its further development.…”
Section: Current Legal Status Of Cryptocurrency In Ukrainementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the possibility to run ABS in a cryptocurrency context bears societal risks. Evidence exists that deception and fraudulent behavior are rampant on public blockchains, in particular in the context of cryptocurrencies [55]. Hence, it can be expected that malicious actors will attempt to use the complexity of agent-based simulations as an obfuscation tool to disguise behavior that is unfavorable for other participants.…”
Section: Enterprise Abs With Open Participation a Clear Disadvantagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for Ukraine, according to the explanation of National Bank of Ukraine regarding the legality of "virtual currency/cryptocurrency" Bitcoin usage in Ukraine -Bitcoin is a monetary surrogate, which does not have provision by the real cost and cannot be used by individuals and legal entities on the territory of Ukraine as a means of payment, as far as it contradicts norms of Ukrainian legislation (Natsionalnyi Bank Ukrainy, 2014). It should be noticed that the explanation of the National Bank of Ukraine cannot be considered as a norm as far as it does not provide any responsibility; therefore, it can be utilized as a kind of notification or warning (Drozd, Lazur and Serbin, 2017). It should be noticed that "an ambiguous approach to cryptocurrency in different countries of the world creates additional problems for determining the legal status of cryptocurrency" (Drozd, Basai, Churpita, 2017).…”
Section: The Analyses Of Bitcoin As a Cryptocurrencymentioning
confidence: 99%