OFC/IOOC . Technical Digest. Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 1999, and the International Conference on Integrated Optic
DOI: 10.1109/ofc.1999.767855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical and experimental studies of the influence of the number of crosstalk signals on the penalty caused by incoherent optical crosstalk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This evolution is demonstrated in Fig. 2, which follows similar trends to those predicted in [36]. The power penalties estimated using the GA and MCB are illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: )supporting
confidence: 76%
“…This evolution is demonstrated in Fig. 2, which follows similar trends to those predicted in [36]. The power penalties estimated using the GA and MCB are illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: )supporting
confidence: 76%
“…The HOM fiber itself must also be carefully designed and packaged to minimize distributed mode conversion during propagation within the HOM fiber itself. It has been reported that MPI values of less than 40 dB are required for ultra-longhaul transmission with cascaded HOM devices [56,57]. The accurate measurement of such low MPI values requires specialized techniques [58].…”
Section: Higher-order Mode Fiber Technology For Dispersion Compensationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, is around [22], and is required for less than 1-dB power penalty at a BER of , a pin-type photoreceiver, and non return-to-zero (NRZ) modulation [22]- [26]. If the interferers are due to a single discrete reflection (e.g., a connector) rather than due to multiple reflections (e.g., Rayleigh backscatter), the tolerable SIR can be somewhat lower [24]. Allowing for a transmitter power divergence of 5 dB, (2) predicts a maximum tolerable span loss of 2 dB, which translates into a transmission distance of some 10 km at 1550 nm.…”
Section: In-band Crosstalk and Fecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13(a), the 1-dB penalty is pushed from 26 to 19 dB when going from to , which in the above example increases the tolerable span attenuation to 8 dB (or 40 km at 1550 nm). Since the data extinction ratio has a strong impact on the beat-noise induced penalties caused by in-band crosstalk [24], the poor extinction of the 2.5-Gb/s rated DML operated at 10 Gb/s [ Fig. 13(b)] artificially reduces the allowable SIR, and is not too representative of realistically deployable 10-Gb/s systems.…”
Section: In-band Crosstalk and Fecmentioning
confidence: 99%