2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.07.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical and experimental modal analysis of the Guangzhou New TV Tower

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…건물 에 설치된 센서로부터 계측한 응답을 이용하여 건물 내 구조 부재들의 안전성을 평가하거나 시스템 식별(system identification)을 통해 시스템 레벨의 상태를 평가한다 (Lamarche et al, 2007;Zimmerman et al, 2009;Chen et al, 2011;Ye et al, 2012). Table 1 Model updating results …”
Section: 서 론 건물 구조물의 상태를 파악하고 안전성을 평가하기 위한unclassified
“…건물 에 설치된 센서로부터 계측한 응답을 이용하여 건물 내 구조 부재들의 안전성을 평가하거나 시스템 식별(system identification)을 통해 시스템 레벨의 상태를 평가한다 (Lamarche et al, 2007;Zimmerman et al, 2009;Chen et al, 2011;Ye et al, 2012). Table 1 Model updating results …”
Section: 서 론 건물 구조물의 상태를 파악하고 안전성을 평가하기 위한unclassified
“…[2][3][4][5][6] In order to depict the relationship between modal parameters and ambient conditions, a number of long-term monitoring systems were operated for different types of structures, including bridge, [7][8][9] reinforced concrete buildings, [10][11][12] and other types. [13][14][15] In these studies, it has been shown that the fluctuation of the structural dynamical properties was significant due to the variation of ambient conditions, and the modal frequencies exhibited strong correlation with temperature and relative humidity. If the modal frequency-ambient condition pattern is not appropriately captured, there will be substantial bias in the structural health assessment results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C., 2002). To improve buildings' seismic performance, when the designing standard and disciplines of anti-seismic criterion are relatively unclear, GCES assisted relevant organizations to complete the following tests, to be specific, the wind tunnel force balance test on Canton Tower structure (completed by State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University) (Gu, Huang, Zhu, & Pan, 2009;Zhou, Gu, Zhu, & Huang, 2009) (Pan, Zhou, & Liang, 2008;Zhou, 2006), the experimental investigation on stability of the exterior steel frame and waist portion of Canton Tower (completed by Tsinghua University) (Guo, Liu, Wang, Lin, Pan, & Liang, 2008), the experimental research on bidirectional hinge joints in Canton Tower (completed by College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University) (Chen, Zhao, & Wang, 2007), the advisory report of long-term corrosion resistance and protection technology about Canton Tower (completed by Central Iron & Steel Research Institute, CISRI), the advisory report of steel pipe production process for steel structure analysis (completed by Beijing Yuanda International Project Management Consulting Co., Ltd.), and vibrating stress relief test on welded steel tube of Canton Tower (completed by Shanghai Jiao Tong University), the test on F 1000 mm  50 mm hot forging hemisphere of Canton Tower (completed by Jiangsu Huning Steel Mechanism Co., Ltd.), the experimental study on atmosphere corrosion resisting structural steel of BRA520C (Q420GJCW) of Canton Tower (completed by Central Research Institute of Building and Construction Co., Ltd., MCC Group).…”
Section: Test and Studymentioning
confidence: 99%