2020
DOI: 10.1002/aelm.202000255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical and Experimental Investigations on the Aggregation‐Enhanced Emission from Dark State: Vibronic Coupling Effect

Abstract: Aggregation‐induced/‐enhanced emission (AIE/AEE) has aroused broad interest. The mechanism behind is understood as the aggregation restriction of the nonradiative decay from electronically excited state to the ground state, either through interconversion or through conical intersection, leaving the dipole‐allowed radiative decay channel relatively intact. Here, a report on an AEE phenomenon for 5,10‐diphenylphenazine (DPhPZ) compound is presented, for which the experiment shows to be AEE active but the lowest … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the weak MO coupling between S 3 and S 1 is consistent with the slow IC rates of the S 3 –S 1 transition observed in the time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy experiments. Since the S 1 –S 0 transition is forbidden in N–B′ , the observed weak low-energy emission of N–B in solutions might be due to the vibronic coupling-induced radiative decay . According to the classical ICT models, the previous N–Ar–B systems have generally exhibited more twisted structures in more polar solvents. ,, Therefore, with a switch from toluene to THF, it is reasonable to believe that the enhanced anti-Kasha emission (high-energy emission) of N–B stems from a weakened S 1 –S 0 coupling of its more stabilized and twisted structure in polar solvents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the weak MO coupling between S 3 and S 1 is consistent with the slow IC rates of the S 3 –S 1 transition observed in the time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy experiments. Since the S 1 –S 0 transition is forbidden in N–B′ , the observed weak low-energy emission of N–B in solutions might be due to the vibronic coupling-induced radiative decay . According to the classical ICT models, the previous N–Ar–B systems have generally exhibited more twisted structures in more polar solvents. ,, Therefore, with a switch from toluene to THF, it is reasonable to believe that the enhanced anti-Kasha emission (high-energy emission) of N–B stems from a weakened S 1 –S 0 coupling of its more stabilized and twisted structure in polar solvents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we calculate K ISC and K RISC between S 1 and T 1 , Δ G ji = E S1 – E T1 and Δ G ji = E T1 – E S1 respectively. All the abovementioned methods can be found in Peng’s, Shuai’s, and our previous works. …”
Section: Theoretical Methods and Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21,22,31] Moreover, a "dark" state with symmetry-forbidden transition is also found to emit bright light owing to the Herzberg-Teller vibronic coupling in 5, 10-diphenylphenazine (DPhPZ) aggregate. [23] As a result, the novel cores/backbones of AIEgens are exploited which provides a new stage to tremendously broaden the scope of excellent AIEgens. Several examples are presented in the following subsections.…”
Section: Emergence Of the Lowest State S 1 As Bright State Upon Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plausible intermolecular quantum phase led by aggregation will be hindered owing to the flexible intramolecular motions in these AIEgens. [9] As a result, a variety of explanations have been proposed for AIE phenomena for different organic systems, such as restriction of the intramolecular rotation (RIR), [8,10] restriction of intermolecular motion (RIM) [15] and blocking of nonradiative decay channels, [16] the restriction of E/Z isomerization process, [17] the excited-state intramolecular proton transfer, [18] the blockage of access to dark state via isomerization, [19] restricted access to conical intersection [20] crystalline-induced reversal from dark to bright state, [21,22] Herzberg-Tell vibronic coupling induced emission, [23] and so on. [9,10] Nevertheless, a clear and comprehensive picture…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%