Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of Gating Performance of Subnanosecond Image Intensifier With Microstrip Photocathode

Zhang, Mei; Sheng, Liang; Hu, Huasi; Li, Yang; Liu, Yongtang; Hei, Dongwei; Bodong, Peng; Zhao, Jianlong

doi:10.1109/tns.2018.2855447

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, Sokollik et al (2009), with an unusually large magnification of M ¼ 70 (which would not be suitable for most experiments) and a time gating of δt G ¼ 4.5 ns, obtained a temporal resolution of δt ∼ 65 ps. However, even with δt G ∼ 1 ns [possible in principle if using state-of-the art scintillators and/or gating (Hu et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2018;Shevelev et al, 2022)] and a relatively large but more typical magnification M (for instance, M ∼ 20), it is challenging to reach temporal resolutions comparable to the picosecond capabilities of RCF and TNSA sources; see Sec. II.C.4.…”

Section: B Advanced Detectorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Proton imaging of high-energy-density laboratory plasmas

Schaeffer,

Bott,

Borghesi

et al. 2023

Rev. Mod. Phys.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Proton imaging has become a key diagnostic for measuring electromagnetic fields in high-energydensity (HED) laboratory plasmas. Compared to other techniques for diagnosing fields, proton imaging is a measurement that can simultaneously offer high spatial and temporal resolution and the ability to distinguish between electric and magnetic fields without the protons perturbing the plasma of interest. Consequently, proton imaging has been used in a wide range of HED experiments, from

show abstract