2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2006.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical and experimental evidence of different wettability classes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). The existence of these three different classes of intermediate wettability was later verified both theoretically and experimentally (Skauge et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). The existence of these three different classes of intermediate wettability was later verified both theoretically and experimentally (Skauge et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Contact angles are chosen for both the water-and oil-wet pores. The physical evolution of the three wetting states is described theoretically by Skauge et al (2006). Pores with star shaped cross sections will have a higher disjoining pressure in the small pores than in the larger pores.…”
Section: Wettability Alterationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mixed-wet large sandstones, only the large pores are oil-wet, and in mixed-wet small, the small pores are also oil-wet. The pores in our chalk samples are Ϸ100 times smaller than sandstone (24), but their randomly distributed, variable size hydrophobic and hydrophilic patches put them decidedly into the fractionally wet class. For macroscopic determination by imbibition, the sample would appear water-wet, which is consistent with macroscopic data from our own samples and those of others (25); water imbibes easily into freshly fractured chalk surfaces.…”
Section: Afm Force Mappingmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Salathiel (6) originally proposed that mixed-wettability means a continuous pathway of oil-wet surfaces interconnected through pores. Skague et al (24) categorized wettability for sandstones into three subclasses defined by size and location of the oil-wet patches relative to the size of the pores and the channels between them. A ''fractionally wet'' sample was defined to have variable size water-and oil-wet domains.…”
Section: Afm Force Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Uncertainty in the experimental input properties to the model: pore space images and spatial wettability distribution [5,9] (2) Uncertainty due to model simplifications, incorporated physics, and numerics [10] (3) Uncertainty due to sampling and scale difference between the model, typically a few mm 3 , and the experiment, which may be performed on a rock volume of several cm 3 [11] * t.bultreys@imperial.ac.uk…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%