1986
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9517(86)90269-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical and experimental aspects of surface diffusion in porous catalysts I. Nonreactive conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mobility cannot be rigorously described with existing knowledge about surface chemistry and migration mechanisms, and cannot be independently measured on equivalent at surfaces without signiÿcant concerns about ÿdelity. The length of the surface connecting path is not measurable without an independent assessment of surface mobility; the consequent absence of surface tortuosity measurements impedes our progress in understanding and predicting contributions from surface di usion to overall transport within complex porous structures (Tsotsis, Sane, Webster, & Goddard, 1986). In this study, we have developed relations between void and surface tortuosities for solids with a given void fraction achieved via well-deÿned mechanisms for void formation and destruction (densiÿcation or coarsening).…”
Section: Implications For Description and Understanding Of Pore Strucmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Mobility cannot be rigorously described with existing knowledge about surface chemistry and migration mechanisms, and cannot be independently measured on equivalent at surfaces without signiÿcant concerns about ÿdelity. The length of the surface connecting path is not measurable without an independent assessment of surface mobility; the consequent absence of surface tortuosity measurements impedes our progress in understanding and predicting contributions from surface di usion to overall transport within complex porous structures (Tsotsis, Sane, Webster, & Goddard, 1986). In this study, we have developed relations between void and surface tortuosities for solids with a given void fraction achieved via well-deÿned mechanisms for void formation and destruction (densiÿcation or coarsening).…”
Section: Implications For Description and Understanding Of Pore Strucmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While A and B are to be thought of as ordinary reaction and product molecules, the symbols with asterisks refer to mobile intermediates, either in bulk or adsorbed on solid surfaces. In the latter case, the aq and w3 reflect physico chemical adsorption-desorption rates (Tsotsis et al 1986(Tsotsis et al , 1988, while the concentrations A*,B*,..., together with the fluxes and the various mathematical operations in (1), ( 2), et seq., are to be interpreted accordingly. Although monomolecular in appearance, the elementary forms (47) and their consequents can readily be applied to more complex stoichiometry on replacing A, B ,..., by appropriate stoichiometric multiples; or they can be reinterpreted in a conceptual way by viewing each symbol as a collection of chemical species.…”
Section: Applications To Reactive Transport Schemamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a physical point of view, the most interesting result is, rather, the appearance of concentration-dependent diffusivities in ( 57) and ( 58). These terms, representing facilitated diffusion, due to mobile intermediates or adsorbed species, are also known in other contexts (Goddard 1974;Tsotsis et al 1986Tsotsis et al , 1988 although they may not be fully appreciated in the general literature on transport and reaction. With more complex reaction schema the general analysis of §2 shows that diffusive coupling, as well as variable diffusivities, may also arise in otherwise uncoupled systems.…”
Section: Rapid Activation or Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%