C−H σ-bond activation of arene (represented here by benzene) by the Ni 0 propene complex Ni 0 (IMes)-(C 3 H 6 ) (IMes = 1,3-dimesitylimidazol-2-ylidene), which is an important elementary step in Ni-catalyzed hydroarylation of unactivated alkene with arene, was investigated by DFT calculations. In the Ni 0 complex, the C−H activation occurs through a ligand-to-ligand H transfer mechanism to yield Ni II (IMes)(C 3 H 7 )(Ph) (C 3 H 7 = propyl; Ph = phenyl). In Pd 0 and Pt 0 analogues, the activation occurs through concerted oxidative addition of the C−H bond to the metal. Analysis of the electron redistribution during the C−H activation highlights the difference between the two mechanisms. In the ligand-toligand H transfer, charge transfer (CT) occurs from the metal to the benzene. However, the atomic population of the transferring H remains almost constant, suggesting that different CT simultaneously occurs from the transferring H to the LUMO of propene. The electron redistribution contrasts significantly with that found for Pd 0 and Pt 0 , in which CT occurs only from the metal to the benzene. Preference for ligand-to-ligand H transfer over concerted oxidative addition in the Ni 0 complex is shown to be due to the smaller atomic radius of Ni in comparison to those of Pd and Pt and the smaller Ni II −H bond energy relative to the Pd II −H and Pt II −H energies. Interestingly, the bulky ligand accelerates the ligand-to-ligand H transfer in the Ni 0 complex by decreasing the distance between the coordinated benzene and alkene substrates. Thus, the Gibbs activation energy (ΔG°⧧) decreases in the case of cyclic-alkylaminocarbene with bulky substituents (CACC-K3), while the ΔG°⧧ values are similar in X-Phos, IMes, and nonsubstituted cyclic alkylaminocarbene (CAAC-K0). An electron-withdrawing substituent on the arene accelerates the C−H activation by favoring the metal to arene CT.