1997
DOI: 10.1021/jp972657l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical Analysis of the Bonding between CO and Positively Charged Atoms

Abstract: A detailed analysis of the changes in the electronic structure of CO when a proton or a positive charge approaches the carbon or the oxygen atom is reported using quantum mechanical ab initio calculations and several methods to analyze the theoretical data. The C−O bond is shortened by nearly the same amount in HCO+ and QCO+ compared to free CO, while the nearly identical C−O bond lengths of COH+ and COQ+ are longer than in CO. H+ and Q+ have a strong electrostatic effect upon the atom to which they are bonded… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

26
236
1
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(267 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
26
236
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher level, basis set independent Hartree-Fock ab initio calculations contradict the molecular orbital results and show that the 5 orbital in free CO is, if anything, bonding with regard to the C-O coordinate. 22 Rather, the high values of ͑CO͒ in the nonclassical CO metal complexes could be shown to be due to electrostatic effects related to the cationic metal centers encountered in these complexes. 22,23 The general conclusion from these and other arguments is that M ← C bonding plays no major role in determining ͑CO͒ in transition metal carbonyls in general.…”
Section: -mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Higher level, basis set independent Hartree-Fock ab initio calculations contradict the molecular orbital results and show that the 5 orbital in free CO is, if anything, bonding with regard to the C-O coordinate. 22 Rather, the high values of ͑CO͒ in the nonclassical CO metal complexes could be shown to be due to electrostatic effects related to the cationic metal centers encountered in these complexes. 22,23 The general conclusion from these and other arguments is that M ← C bonding plays no major role in determining ͑CO͒ in transition metal carbonyls in general.…”
Section: -mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…22 Rather, the high values of ͑CO͒ in the nonclassical CO metal complexes could be shown to be due to electrostatic effects related to the cationic metal centers encountered in these complexes. 22,23 The general conclusion from these and other arguments is that M ← C bonding plays no major role in determining ͑CO͒ in transition metal carbonyls in general. 23 Note that this does not mean that bonding is unimportant, but only that ͑CO͒ is relatively insensitive to it.…”
Section: -mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This leads to a strengthening of the C-O bond and to a rising of the stretching force constant. 40 Au-CO bonding in AuCO + is thought to involve some degree of Au + f CO π-back-donation, despite the high value of ν(CO) (ranging from 2237 cm -1 in a neon matrix to ∼2000 cm -1 in AuCO + salts) that classifies the bonding as "nonclassical" under the criterion that ν(CO) is greater than its value in free CO. 41 It is recognized that, while π-back-donation weakens the CO bond and usually reduces ν(CO) to below that of free CO, its effect can be offset by the electrostatic effect of the charge on the metal interacting with the CO dipole. We attribute the decrease in ν(CO) with cluster size to charge dilution.…”
Section: Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sin embargo, algunos trabajos sugieren que las interacciones electrostáticas entre la especie metálica y la molécula de CO pueden proporcionar efectos adicionales interesantes en estos sistemas. Los cálculos sugieren que la carga de metal puede desempeñar un papel importante en la polarización de la densidad electrónica del CO. [30][31][32] Desafortunadamente, hay pocos estudios de carbonilos metálicos aislados en fase gaseosa en donde investigar estas predicciones. En este trabajo se estudia, entre otras cosas, como varia la polarizabilidad del para electrónico del C del CO y su influencia en la estabilidad de la especie metálica.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified