2000
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45356-3_36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical Analysis of Simplex Crossover for Real-Coded Genetic Algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
49
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the binary-coded crossover operator requires the user to specify the number of cross-sites. For real-parameter recombination operators such as SBX [6], BLX [16] and FR [39] require a parameter, controlling the extent of the search, whereas some recombination operators such as PCX [9], UNDX [29], SPX [25], differential evolution (DE) [38], operator in particle swarm optimization (PSO) [28] require more than one parameters to be set by the user.…”
Section: Evolutionary Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the binary-coded crossover operator requires the user to specify the number of cross-sites. For real-parameter recombination operators such as SBX [6], BLX [16] and FR [39] require a parameter, controlling the extent of the search, whereas some recombination operators such as PCX [9], UNDX [29], SPX [25], differential evolution (DE) [38], operator in particle swarm optimization (PSO) [28] require more than one parameters to be set by the user.…”
Section: Evolutionary Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several non-traditional crossover operators for real-coded representation are found in the recent literature. They include SBX (simulated binary crossover) (Ballester & Carter, 2003;2004b;Deb & Agrawal, 1995;Deb & Beyer, 1999;Deb & Kumar, 1995;Deb et al, 2007), UNDX (unimodal normal distribution crossover) (Kita et al, 1998;Ono et al, 1999;Ono & Kobayashi, 1997), SPX (simplex crossover) (Higuchi et al, 2000;Tsutsui & Goldberg, 2002;, PCX (parent-centric crossover) (Ballester & Carter, 2004a;Deb et al, 2002), etc (Herrera et al, 2003;Takahashi & Kita, 2001). Most of them are complex and based on the specific probability distribution of the offspring (SBX, UNDX, and PCX), self-adaptivity (SBX and UNDX), or multiple parents (UNDX and SPX).…”
Section: Previous Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reported that, for some problems, real-coded representation and associated techniques outperform conventional binary representation (Eshelman & Schaffer, 1993;Herrera et al, 1998;Janikow & Michalewicz, 1991;Lozano et al, 2004;Ono et al, 1999;Ono & Kobayashi, 1997;Surry & Radcliffe, 1996;Wright, 1991). Several theoretical studies of real-coded GAs have also been performed (Goldberg, 1991;Higuchi et al, 2000;Kita et al, 1998;Qi & Palmieri, 1994a;. However, the role and behavior of genetic operators in real-coded GAs are fundamentally different from those in binary encodings although motivation of the operators and the framework of GAs are similar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This guideline means that the distribution of offspring generated by crossovers should preserve the statistics such as the mean vector and the covariance matrix of the parental population. Several real-coded crossovers have been proposed following this guideline and the validity thereof has been verified [6] [5]. This guideline regards that a real-coded crossover is an operator which maps the probability distribution of parents to that of offspring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then we show that KDE can be actually designed from crossover Unimodal Normal Distribution Crossover (UNDXm) [6] and Simplex Crossover (SPX) [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%