DOI: 10.25148/etd.fi14050407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical analysis of cross joint geometries and their classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thoroughly studied by several authors (e.g. Hodgson, 1961;Hanckock, 1985;Bai and Gross, 1999;Fabbri et al, 2001;Bai et al, 2002) the cross-joints are smaller, abut against the systematic joints and may develop at different angles to them, although for each geological context the angle between cross-joints and systematic joints has a small dispersion. Two mechanisms have been proposed for the formation of one main joint set bounding a secondary one oriented at a high angle.…”
Section: The Role Of Tectonics and The Trigger Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thoroughly studied by several authors (e.g. Hodgson, 1961;Hanckock, 1985;Bai and Gross, 1999;Fabbri et al, 2001;Bai et al, 2002) the cross-joints are smaller, abut against the systematic joints and may develop at different angles to them, although for each geological context the angle between cross-joints and systematic joints has a small dispersion. Two mechanisms have been proposed for the formation of one main joint set bounding a secondary one oriented at a high angle.…”
Section: The Role Of Tectonics and The Trigger Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orthogonal joints perpendicular to bedding constitute one of the most common patterns of joints found on superficial outcrops of sedimentary rocks and occur in many oil reservoirs and aquifer in sedimentary terrain. Abutting and crosscutting relationships as well as markedly differing joint orientations seem to imply that the two sets formed neither at the same time nor under the same stress conditions (Bai and Gross, 1999). In our model, we consider that the second set of fractures is younger than the first set.…”
Section: Three Dimensional Fracture Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%