2003
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45028-9_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical Analysis and Experimental Comparison of Graph Matching Algorithms for Database Filtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A graphical illustration is shown in Figure 1. The presented work extends previous studies on graph matching performance and graph database filtering (see [11,12]). In contrast with the work reported in [11], which was restricted to the case of graph isomorphism, the present paper deals with the problem of subgraph-isomorphism.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A graphical illustration is shown in Figure 1. The presented work extends previous studies on graph matching performance and graph database filtering (see [11,12]). In contrast with the work reported in [11], which was restricted to the case of graph isomorphism, the present paper deals with the problem of subgraph-isomorphism.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Database filtering in conjunction with subgraph-isomorphism search was also studied in [13]. However, the decision trees used in [13] were identical to the decision trees used in [11,12] for graph-isomorphism, and the case of subgraph-isomorphism was dealt with by means of an extended decision tree traversal procedure. By contrast, a generalized decision tree induction procedure is proposed in the present paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of such scheme is to optimize the graph matching procedure. In [8] one important highlighted aspect, which is widely neglected; that the "non-matching symbol" matching time in any algorithms plays a crucial role in determining the performance of the graph-matching algorithm. So for large databases, a small number of expected matches and no filtering would definitely degrade the performance of any graph-matching algorithm by matching the "non-matching symbol" from the database.…”
Section: Error-correcting Graph Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So for large databases, a small number of expected matches and no filtering would definitely degrade the performance of any graph-matching algorithm by matching the "non-matching symbol" from the database. In [8] number of parameters are identified that affect the performance of any graph matching algorithm such as total database size, size of database after filtering, number of matches in the database and time needed for filtering. Graph matching is a quite expensive procedure.…”
Section: Error-correcting Graph Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation