1981
DOI: 10.1016/0032-5910(81)85002-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thematic bibliography of mercury porosimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 313 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This technique's non-wetting fluid should be non-reactive with the porous medium. Van Brakel et al (1981) and Modrý et al (1981) provide an excellent review of mercury injection porosimetry techniques and models for interpreting mercury porosimetry data. However, MICP only provides partial pore structure information (i.e., the pore throat size distribution) of porous media, which introduces some ambiguity in the pore structure information available from MICP capillary pressure curves since it is possible for porous media with different pore structures (due to a difference in pore body size distributions) to have similar capillary pressure curves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique's non-wetting fluid should be non-reactive with the porous medium. Van Brakel et al (1981) and Modrý et al (1981) provide an excellent review of mercury injection porosimetry techniques and models for interpreting mercury porosimetry data. However, MICP only provides partial pore structure information (i.e., the pore throat size distribution) of porous media, which introduces some ambiguity in the pore structure information available from MICP capillary pressure curves since it is possible for porous media with different pore structures (due to a difference in pore body size distributions) to have similar capillary pressure curves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%