1976
DOI: 10.1007/bf01437868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TheK-Fluorescence Yield of Germanium

Abstract: The K-Fluorescence Yield cox of Germanium has been measured using the coincidence method and investigating the decay of V4As. The branching ratios of this decay had to be measured and all relevant determining values, as detection efficiencies, absorption coefficients etc. The experimental results are P~coK = 0.494_+ 0.012 and OK = 0.561 +0.015 using PK=0.881 +0.003. For the branching ratios of the decay of 74As we obtained

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the available experimental results, we notice that the ones by Pahor et al [16], Hartl et al [17], and Brunner [19] agree with our results; the relative differences to the measured value in this work being 0.1%, 1.5%, and 3.8%, respectively. TABLE III.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding the available experimental results, we notice that the ones by Pahor et al [16], Hartl et al [17], and Brunner [19] agree with our results; the relative differences to the measured value in this work being 0.1%, 1.5%, and 3.8%, respectively. TABLE III.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The remaining values by Krause [22], Hubbell et al [23], and Walters et al [4] lie outside the above-mentioned region. This work 0.553 ± 0.013 0.547 Pahor et al [16] 0 .554 ± 0.003 McGuire et al [3] 0.558 Kostroun et al [24] 0.545 Walters et al [4] 0.534 Bambynek et al [5] 0.540 Hartl et al [17] 0 .561 ± 0.015 Krause [22] 0.535 Casnati et al [18] 0 .549 ± 0.011 Brunner [19] 0 .532 ± 0.016 Pious et al [20] 0 .538 ± 0.029 Hubbell et al [23] 0.523 Durak et al [21] 0 .537 ± 0.03…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation