2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.102078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theileria and Babesia infection in cattle – First molecular survey in Kazakhstan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prevalence of Theileria annulata in cattle has also been reported from different countries around the globe. Prevalence of Theileria annulata in cattle has been reported to be 83% in Kazakhstan [ 24 ], 39% in Sudan [ 25 ], 25.4% in Algeria [ 26 ], 23.3% in India [ 27 ], 18.2% in Northwest China [ 28 ], 16.5% in Egypt [ 29 ] and 1.9% in Saudi Arabia [ 30 ]. These differences in Theileria annulata infection rates are due to variations in tick control programs, habitat suitability for ticks, farm management, husbandry practices and abiotic factors of sampling sites [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prevalence of Theileria annulata in cattle has also been reported from different countries around the globe. Prevalence of Theileria annulata in cattle has been reported to be 83% in Kazakhstan [ 24 ], 39% in Sudan [ 25 ], 25.4% in Algeria [ 26 ], 23.3% in India [ 27 ], 18.2% in Northwest China [ 28 ], 16.5% in Egypt [ 29 ] and 1.9% in Saudi Arabia [ 30 ]. These differences in Theileria annulata infection rates are due to variations in tick control programs, habitat suitability for ticks, farm management, husbandry practices and abiotic factors of sampling sites [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collected ticks (n = 15) were evaluated for Theileria annulate (enolase gene) and Babesia spp. (18 S ribosomal RNA gene) via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the primers and protocol described by Kuibagarov et al (2023) and Hilpertshauser et al (2006) . The remaining collected ticks (n = 2) were added to the Kazakh Scientific Research Institute's collection and were, therefore, not evaluated via PCR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be a similar scenario between some HIV patients showing the highest prevalence of tick-borne pathogens [ 3 ]. These multiple, unrelated and complex infections are putting pressure on medical practitioners and veterinarians to successfully treat them, while co-infections between tick-borne pathogens, possibly transmitted by the same tick species, are creating a public-health problem to tackle [ 4 , 5 , 6 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%