2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thecamoebians (Testate Amoebae) Straddling the Permian-Triassic Boundary in the Guryul Ravine Section, India: Evolutionary and Palaeoecological Implications

Abstract: Exceptionally well-preserved organic remains of thecamoebians (testate amoebae) were preserved in marine sediments that straddle the greatest extinction event in the Phanerozoic: the Permian-Triassic Boundary. Outcrops from the Late Permian Zewan Formation and the Early Triassic Khunamuh Formation are represented by a complete sedimentary sequence at the Guryul Ravine Section in Kashmir, India, which is an archetypal Permian-Triassic boundary sequence [1]. Previous biostratigraphic analysis provides chronologi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Singh et al . ) and as VSMs are a polyphyletic categorization, taxonomic differences are also likely. The wide variety of preservational windows available for Neoproterozoic VSMs, including those documented herein, suggest that it was not the closing of a taphonomic window, but other factors (perhaps changing ecosystem preferences to lacustrine environments, extinction, or selection for non‐testate amoeba) that led to the disappearance of characteristic high diversity Neoproterozoic VSM assemblages from the fossil record.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Singh et al . ) and as VSMs are a polyphyletic categorization, taxonomic differences are also likely. The wide variety of preservational windows available for Neoproterozoic VSMs, including those documented herein, suggest that it was not the closing of a taphonomic window, but other factors (perhaps changing ecosystem preferences to lacustrine environments, extinction, or selection for non‐testate amoeba) that led to the disappearance of characteristic high diversity Neoproterozoic VSM assemblages from the fossil record.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a Phanerozoic fossil record of testate amoebae, but these fossils differ in their morphology, taxonomy and taphonomy from those found in the Neoproterozoic (Singh et al . ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The Phanerozoic fossil record of terrestrial amoebozoans is meager, comprising a handful of well-documented records (e.g., [35] and references therein; [36]). Until now, the oldest widely accepted fossils of terrestrial arcellinids came from upper Permian fluvial rocks that contain species assigned to the families Arcellidae, Centropyxidae, Plagiopyxidae, Difflugidae, and Trigonopyxidae [36,37]. Freshwater species of the families Centropyxidae and Difflugiidae have also been recorded from Upper Triassic amber [38], and Centropyxidae, Difflugiidae, Hyalosphenidae, and Phryganellidae occur in Cretaceous amber and non-marine shales from Canada, US, and Europe ( [30] and references therein; [35]).…”
Section: And Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stratigraphic range. Although some arcellinidan species have been found in sediments dating as far back as the Permian (Singh et al, 2015), the type species of the new genus Erugomicula bidens has, to date, only been observed in Holocene lacustrine sediments (Medioli and Scott, 1983).…”
Section: Systematic Palaeontologymentioning
confidence: 99%