Abstract:This special issue sets out to explore the Theatrics of Transnational Criminal Justice. ‘Why’, we ask, ‘do transnational criminal justice actors perform themselves as they do?’ ‘Why are their representations frequently, if not different from, then often quite dramatized versions of the average reality of their practices?’ ‘What does such dramatization tell us about not only the symbolism but also the structure and state of transnational criminal justice?’ And, more generally, ‘what do such performances of tran… Show more
“…Thus, Southernising border criminology will benefit from explicit theorisation of the relationship between the social and material structures of global hierarchy on the one hand, and the political agency of Northern and Southern state actors, IOs, migrants and new digital technologies on the other. Recent scholarship on border control and transnational criminal justice has indicated the value of doing so through the framework of performativity (Franko 2021;Palmer 2021;Sausdal and Lohne 2021;Singler 2021;Stambøl 2021); below, I demonstrate the strengths and a potential shortcoming of this perspective with reference to the bordering practices of Nigerian federal authorities.…”
Section: 'Racial Technologies' Of Border Control and The Southernisin...mentioning
This article seeks to expand debates about Southernising border criminology to include an ontological dimension. In the context of increasingly technological border control practices, critical analysis of the global circuits of mobility control requires explicit theorisation of the ontological status of humans vis-a-vis their material environment. Such theorisation can also imbue border criminology scholarship with a radical democratic openness to Southern worldviews by destabilising traditional Northern forms of knowledge production about borders and migration. To this end, I synthesise insights from the framework of performativity and the philosophical tradition of pragmatism to propose a framework for analysing the deployment of novel border control technologies in the Global South. The resultant framework challenges state-centric and Northern-centric perspectives on crimmigration control by foregrounding Southern agency and explicitly challenging technicist framings of border control technologies that represent these tools as neutral technical components within a broader global system of state-based ‘migration management’.
“…Thus, Southernising border criminology will benefit from explicit theorisation of the relationship between the social and material structures of global hierarchy on the one hand, and the political agency of Northern and Southern state actors, IOs, migrants and new digital technologies on the other. Recent scholarship on border control and transnational criminal justice has indicated the value of doing so through the framework of performativity (Franko 2021;Palmer 2021;Sausdal and Lohne 2021;Singler 2021;Stambøl 2021); below, I demonstrate the strengths and a potential shortcoming of this perspective with reference to the bordering practices of Nigerian federal authorities.…”
Section: 'Racial Technologies' Of Border Control and The Southernisin...mentioning
This article seeks to expand debates about Southernising border criminology to include an ontological dimension. In the context of increasingly technological border control practices, critical analysis of the global circuits of mobility control requires explicit theorisation of the ontological status of humans vis-a-vis their material environment. Such theorisation can also imbue border criminology scholarship with a radical democratic openness to Southern worldviews by destabilising traditional Northern forms of knowledge production about borders and migration. To this end, I synthesise insights from the framework of performativity and the philosophical tradition of pragmatism to propose a framework for analysing the deployment of novel border control technologies in the Global South. The resultant framework challenges state-centric and Northern-centric perspectives on crimmigration control by foregrounding Southern agency and explicitly challenging technicist framings of border control technologies that represent these tools as neutral technical components within a broader global system of state-based ‘migration management’.
“…You know, someone who'll misinterpret or misuse what we say.' As a police ethnographer, I have had many front-row insights into the police's workaday efforts to combat issues of transnational crime in Denmark and beyondinsights which among other things have led me to discuss both the surprising triviality of such work (Sausdal, 2021a;Sausdal and Lohne, 2021), and graver issues such as police xenophobia (Sausdal, 2018c), violence (Sausdal, 2019), surveillance (Sausdal, 2018a) and warlike behavior (Sausdal, 2021a) as they relate to what Bowling and Sheptycki (2010) have termed "the globalization of policing". This chapter looks at another issue; an issue of methodology rather than theory.…”
Suspicion is endemic to police ethnography. As research has demonstrated, the police repeatedly probe into the ethnographer's intent and purposes. Is the ethnographer observing police work to "simply" carry out research? Or is the ethnographer actually there to help develop the profession or, worse, to deviously disclose police secrets? Yet, doing police ethnography not only involves the ethnographer being questioned by the police; it also frequently involves being asked similarly interrogating questions by academic peers. Amplified by present-day critiques of police misconduct, colleagues ask about the police ethnographer's commitment. Has the ethnographer, for example, 'gone native' and thereby lost the ability to shine a needed critical light? Bearing such question(ing)s in mind, this chapter introduces the methodological concept of "the collaborator". Using the oxymoronic meaning of the word, the chapter considers how police ethnography often involves navigating contested waters with both police and peers questioning the ethnographer's allegiances, thereby wrestling with continuous queries about whether the ethnographer is in fact collaborating with or against the police. In doing this, the chapter adds to existing methodological debates about the ethics and loyalties of (police) ethnography, pointing to how the question of suspicion and side-taking extend all the way from the offices of the police to the hallways of academia. Drawing on the author's own experiences of studying transnational policing practices across Europe, the chapter concludes by offering five recommendations as to how the police ethnographer may continue to produce quality ethnography while, for better or worse, being cast as a collaborator.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.