2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10482-008-9296-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The β-tubulin gene as a molecular phylogenetic marker for classification and discrimination of the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex

Abstract: The Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex comprises seven very closely related species. In this study, we compared the use of two different phylogenetic markers, the 26S rDNA and beta-tubulin genes, for discriminating phylogenetic relationships among Saccharomyces sensu stricto strains using sequencing as well as RFLP methods. The average sequence similarity for the beta-tubulin gene (90.0%) among seven strains was significantly less than that for 26S rDNA (98.6%). This result demonstrates that beta-tubulin gene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PCR reaction mixture was comprised of 10 µL fungal DNA, 5 µL 10× PCR buffer, 1.5 µL of 50 mM MgCl 2 , 1 µL of 10 mM dNTP, 0.25 µL Taq polymerase, 40 pM of each forward and the reverse primers in a total reaction volume of 50 µL [13]. The PCR amplification was performed in a GeneAmp® 9700 Thermal Cycler with the following thermal protocol: initial strand denaturation at 94℃ for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94℃ for 1 min, 59℃ for 1 min and 72℃ for 1.5 min and a final extension step at 72℃ for 7 min [17]. The PCR products were analysed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualised using ethidium bromide under UV illumination in a Kodak gel logic 100 gel documentation system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PCR reaction mixture was comprised of 10 µL fungal DNA, 5 µL 10× PCR buffer, 1.5 µL of 50 mM MgCl 2 , 1 µL of 10 mM dNTP, 0.25 µL Taq polymerase, 40 pM of each forward and the reverse primers in a total reaction volume of 50 µL [13]. The PCR amplification was performed in a GeneAmp® 9700 Thermal Cycler with the following thermal protocol: initial strand denaturation at 94℃ for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94℃ for 1 min, 59℃ for 1 min and 72℃ for 1.5 min and a final extension step at 72℃ for 7 min [17]. The PCR products were analysed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualised using ethidium bromide under UV illumination in a Kodak gel logic 100 gel documentation system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phylogenetic relationships among taxa of Ascomycota (Schoch et al 2009a) have been inferred using a variety of protein-coding genes such as the mitochondrial ATP synthase-subunit 6 (Castlebury et al 2004, Sung et al 2007), β-tubulin (Ayliffe et al 2001, Hansen et al 2005, Huang et al 2009, Hsieh et al 2010, Miller and Huhndorf 2004, Tang et al 2007), alpha-actin (Hsieh et al, 2010), glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Berbee et al 1999, Smith 1989) RNA polymerase including the largest and second largest subunits (RPB1, RPB2; Liu et al 1999, Liu and Hall 2004, Zhang and Blackwell 2002, Tang et al 2007, Schmitt et al 2009a, Hsieh et al 2010, and translation elongation factor alpha TEF1 (Mugambi and Huhndorf 2009a, Rehner and Buckley 2005. Use of these protein-coding genes has become increasingly common in systematic studies within the fungal kingdom (Blackwell et al 2006, James et al 2006, Lutzoni et al 2004.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, molecular taxonomy needs to be developed. Current techniques for the molecular taxonomy of yeast include DNA fingerprinting ( RAPD , AFLP , DGGE , SSCP , microsatellites, RFLP ), species‐specific PCR (SS‐PCR), unigene sequencing, multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) and DNA hybridization (Azumi and Goto‐Yamamoto, ; Hennequin et al ., ; Huang et al ., , ; Kurtzman and Robnett, ; Manzano et al ., ; Wang et al ., ). However, some of these techniques are complicated, time‐intensive, costly and cannot easily be used in industrial laboratories…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, molecular taxonomy needs to be developed. Current techniques for the molecular taxonomy of yeast include DNA fingerprinting (RAPD, AFLP, DGGE, SSCP, microsatellites, RFLP), species-specific PCR (SS-PCR), unigene sequencing, multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) and DNA hybridization (Azumi and Goto-Yamamoto, 2001;Hennequin et al, 2001;Huang et al, 2008Huang et al, , 2009Kurtzman and Robnett, 2003;Manzano et al, 2004;Wang et al, 2008). However, some of these techniques are complicated, time-intensive, costly and cannot easily be used in industrial laboratories Large subunit (LSU; 26S) ribosomal DNA has been sequenced for almost all known yeasts and can be act as an identification tool (Fell et al, 2000;Suh et al, 2006;Kurtzman and Robnett, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%