SynopsisSeveral research groups have explored the action pattern of depolymerizing enzymes by examining the distribution of products during the early stages of digestion. Mathematical models for the various mechanisms that have been proposed for the behavior of depolymerizing enzymes are developed in this paper. Published data for several amylases are reexamined in light of this theoretical analysis. It is concluded that following an initial random attack on a long polymer substrate, the enzyme frequently releases only one of the substrate fragments. The retained fragment may be repetitively hydrolyzed near one end to release a series of oligosaccharides before the enzyme substrate-fragment complex finally dissociates. Near optimum conditions Bacillus subtilis (var. amyloliquefaciens) amylase is unique among the enzymes tested because it does not repetitively attack substrate fragments.
INTRODUCTIONIn recent years, the action pattern of amylases has aroused considerable discussion in the literature. Particular interest has been focused on the very high yields of oligosaccharides found during the early stages of starch or amylose hydrolysis. Robyt and F r e n~h l -~ have argued that the large amounts of oligosaccharides present during the early stages of amylolysis are best rationalized by the repetitive (or multiple) attack of the amylase on a substrate (see Fig. Ib). They propose that after the enzyme makes an initial random cleavage of a long substrate molecule, only one of the fragments may be released by the enzyme. The retained fragment suffers reattack one or more times near a chain terminus during the lifetime of the enzyme substrate-fragment complex. Finally, the substrate-fragment dissociates from the e n~y m e .~ Greenwood et al.5-9 have argued that the preferential hydrolysis of bonds near chain ends can account for the large amounts of oligosaccharides observed in the amylase digests (see Fig. lc). They too envision an initial random attack on the substrate but propose that both substrate fragments are normally released from the enzyme after a hydrolytic event. The fragments are subsequently reattacked randomly. However, they agree with Robyt and French that porcine pancreatic amylase is a repetitive attack enzyme, but they believe that this amylase is probably unique in this regard.5 Banks et al.5 have devised a novel qualitative test for repetitive attack based on the change in the polymer