Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1998
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199810000-00051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Zygorbicular Dissection in Composite Rhytidectomy: An Ideal Midface Plane

Abstract: Composite rhytidectomy added the repositioning of the orbicularis oculi muscle to the deep plane face lift to achieve a more harmonious appearance of the face by adding periorbital rejuvenation. By not separating the orbicularis oculi from the zygomaticus minor and by extending the dissection under medial portions of the zygomaticus major and minor muscles, a more significant improvement in composite rhytidectomy can now be achieved. A thin nonrestrictive mesentery between the deep plane face lift dissection a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
75
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
75
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Since then the techniques have evolved from skin only, skin SMAS, modifications of the SMAS, skin platysmal flap, composite, deep plane, subperiosteal, endoscopic, suture suspension and short scar procedures [9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Types Of Face Liftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then the techniques have evolved from skin only, skin SMAS, modifications of the SMAS, skin platysmal flap, composite, deep plane, subperiosteal, endoscopic, suture suspension and short scar procedures [9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Types Of Face Liftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The further development of the primary SMAS technology according to Skoog [30] into a super extended rhytidectomy technique according to Hamra [31] or into a subperiostal technique according to Ramirez [22], with endoscopic support or the opening of the retaining ligaments according to Stuzin [32], shows that constant efforts are being made to detach and to fixate tissues anew, either with cutaneous SMAS preparation and marginal SMAS extension or from a subperiostal aspect using volume compression. These different techniques have in common that they all involve complete preparation and new fixation of margins.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Furnas [7] raised a myocutaneous flap with excision of the cephalic part of orbicularis, which may dissolve the festoons but not the localized edema. The technique proposed by Hamra [8][9][10][11] combines a deep-plane facelift and excision of the lower part of the orbicularis. However, there is a high rate of facial nerve injury with this technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%