1989
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1989.01860360061018
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

The Zygomatic Arch as a Guide to Reconstruction of Comminuted Malar Fractures

Abstract: \s=b\Traditional three-point reduction may not restore proper projection of the malar prominence following a fracture dislocation of the zygoma if two of the three anterior points of realignment are comminuted. In such cases, reconstruction of the fourth or posterior projection, the zygomatic arch, increases the accuracy of the multidimensional reconstruction. Although the extended access approach required to repair the arch increases operative time and possibly length of hospitalization, its use is justified … Show more

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
73
8
5
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
71
11
2

Relationship

0
84

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 84 publications

(32 citation statements)
references

References 5 publications

0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Perfection in restoration of ZAF is important in the management of midface fractures and Zygoma fractures. 22 Adequate and effective management of ZAF is absolutely important due to the risk of ankylosis with Coronoid process of the mandible.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Perfection in restoration of ZAF is important in the management of midface fractures and Zygoma fractures. 22 Adequate and effective management of ZAF is absolutely important due to the risk of ankylosis with Coronoid process of the mandible.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This direct approach carries the risk of leaving a long scar, scalp numbness, alopecia, and injury to the temporal branch of the facial nerve. 19 These risks are present in addition to the usual risks associated with the long operation time. 20…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In major midface trauma, the zygomatic arch is an acknowledged guide to redefine the sagittal projection of the zygoma. 67,84 Isolated zygomatic arch fractures usually present as a clinical entity of minor severity leading to contour depression at the lateral cheek and trismus due to a V-shaped indentation of the fragments toward the coronoid process. Bilateral isolated zygomatic arch fractures, however, are associated with skull or skull base fractures and an ominous sign for serious injury.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various terminology, such as frontobasal, frontofacial, frontal sinus, frontocranial fractures, and according classifications are in common use for a topographical assignment. 23,67,[88][89][90][91][92][93][94] The association of (subcranial) midface fractures and cranial base and/or cranial vault fractures can be captured in the level 3 classification system (►Fig. 10).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irrespective of the vertical fracture level of the three classic Le Fort fracture types, the lower portion of the process stays in connection to the maxilla. 67 This contiguity is responsible for the retrodisplacement in central midface fractures due to the pull of the medial pterygoid muscle inserting in the pterygoid fossa at the back.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation