The Zintl Concept Applied to Intergrowth Structures: Electron‐Hole Matching, Stacking Preferences, and Chemical Pressures in Pd₅InAs

Abstract

Enumerating the potential stacking sequences of layers is a fundamental way to account for the structure diversity of solid state compounds. In many cases, these stacking variations represent polymorphs with only small energetic differences. Here, we examine a compound for which the preferred stacking pattern instead reveals key aspects about its chemical bonding: Pd5InAs. Its structure is based on the intergrowth of slabs of the AuCu3 and PtHg2 (or alternatively, fluorite) structure types. Two basic stacking arrangements are available to this compound, represented by the Pd5TlAs and HoCoGa5 structure types. DFT total energy calculations reveal that the former outcompetes the latter by a staggering 0.65 eV/formula unit. Through a combination of DFT‐reversed approximation Molecular Orbital (DFT‐raMO) and DFT‐Chemical Pressure (DFT‐CP) analysis we trace this preference to two factors. First, with DFT‐raMO analysis, we derive a Zintl‐like bonding scheme of Pd5InAs. This scheme, along with the inspection of selected crystal orbitals, is then connected to preferred stacking through the coordination environments of the Pd atoms at the interface between the Pd−In and Pd−As layers. In the hypothetical HoCoGa5‐type and observed Pd5InAs‐type structures, different Pd coordination environments arise at the interfaces. The hypothetical structure features square planar PdIn2As2 units, in each of which the same 4d‐orbital serves in the Pd sublattice's role as both Lewis acid (for interactions with the As) and Lewis base (for interactions with the In). In the observed structure, tetrahedral PdIn2As2 units occur instead, so that these contradictory roles are distributed to separate 4d‐orbitals, leading to more effective bonding. DFT‐CP analysis illustrates that this driving force for the Pd5TlAs‐type arrangement is supplemented by a favorable alignment of the packing tensions in the parent structures. Altogether, the resulting picture demonstrates how the reaction of simple intermetallic structures to form intergrowths can be guided by recognizable chemical interactions.