2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02197.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Yield Curve and Macroeconomic Dynamics*

Abstract: We show that microfounded DSGE models with nominal rigidities can be successful in replicating features of bond yield data, including sizeable term premia and volatile long-term yields, which have previously been considered puzzling in general equilibrium frameworks. At the same time, sample moments of consumption growth and inflation can be fit relatively well. The improved model performance does not arise directly from the presence of nominal rigidities. However, this feature introduces (short-run) monetary … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
64
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 See Backus, Gregory, and Zin (1989), Donaldson, Johnsen, and Mehra (1990), Den Haan (1995), and Chapman (1997) and to a full second-order approximation around the steady state (Hördahl, Tristani, and Vestin, 2006b) are only moderately more successful, because they imply that all risk premiums in the model are constant (in other words, these authors all assume the weak form of the expectations hypothesis). Obtaining a local approximation that actually produces time-varying risk or term premiums requires a full third-order approximation, as in our analysis above and in Ravenna and Seppälä (2006).…”
Section: F E D E R a L R E S E R V E B A N K O F S T Lo U I S R E V mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 See Backus, Gregory, and Zin (1989), Donaldson, Johnsen, and Mehra (1990), Den Haan (1995), and Chapman (1997) and to a full second-order approximation around the steady state (Hördahl, Tristani, and Vestin, 2006b) are only moderately more successful, because they imply that all risk premiums in the model are constant (in other words, these authors all assume the weak form of the expectations hypothesis). Obtaining a local approximation that actually produces time-varying risk or term premiums requires a full third-order approximation, as in our analysis above and in Ravenna and Seppälä (2006).…”
Section: F E D E R a L R E S E R V E B A N K O F S T Lo U I S R E V mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AR(1) term in d t is omitted to ensure that variations in long-term yields and term premia are primarily explained in our model by consumption and inflation dynamics and not by persistent preference shocks. We simultaneously include habit formation and Epstein-Zin preferences because the New Keynesian model needs both to jointly match macro and financial moments (see Hordahl et al, 2008;Binsbergen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Householdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I propose a method to analytically evaluate conditional expectations of no-arbitrage conditions for bond yields, based on the stochastic discount factor given by a second-order solution of the DSGE model. This approach differs from Hördahl et al (2008), Ravenna and Seppälä (2006), and Rudebusch and Swanson (2008) who use various approximations for bond yields on top of a higher-order approximation to the macro solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%