2016
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The XXL Survey

Abstract: Traditionally, galaxy clusters have been expected to retain all the material accreted since their formation epoch. For this reason, their matter content should be representative of the Universe as a whole, and thus their baryon fraction should be close to the Universal baryon fraction Ω b /Ω m . We make use of the sample of the 100 brightest galaxy clusters discovered in the XXL Survey to investigate the fraction of baryons in the form of hot gas and stars in the cluster population. Since it spans a wide range… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
116
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
12
116
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We find that our measurement Mgas = 5.10 70 M⊙ within the same radius is in good agreement with Eckert et al (2016 …”
Section: Mcxcj02317-0451supporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We find that our measurement Mgas = 5.10 70 M⊙ within the same radius is in good agreement with Eckert et al (2016 …”
Section: Mcxcj02317-0451supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The cluster is referred to as XXL091 in the XXL survey (Eckert et al 2016), and has Mgas = 5.00 is derived from a scaling relation between WL mass and X-ray temperature (Lieu et al 2016). We find that our measurement Mgas = 5.10 70 M⊙ within the same radius is in good agreement with Eckert et al (2016 …”
Section: Mcxcj02317-0451supporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the deprojection, we compared the output of two different methods: the multiscale method described in Eckert et al (2015b) and an onion-peeling method (Ettori et al 2010). Both methods assume spherical symmetry.…”
Section: Xmm-newton Deprojected Electron Density Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each component can then be easily deprojected to reconstruct the 3D profile. Following Eckert et al (2015b), we decompose the projected profile into a sum of King profiles, with s the projected radius, related to the line-of-sight distance and the 3D radius r, by:…”
Section: Xmm-newton Deprojected Electron Density Profilementioning
confidence: 99%