2004
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20034148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The XMM-NewtonHBS28 sample: Studying the obscuration in hard X-ray selected AGNs

Abstract: Abstract. This paper presents the analysis of a statistically complete sample of 28 serendipitous X-ray sources selected in 82 pointed XMM-Newton fields down to a count-rate of 0.002 counts s −1 (4.5-7.5 keV energy band). This is the first sample selected in this energy range to have complete spectroscopic identifications and redshift determinations for all the objects. Apart from one Galactic source (an interacting binary), all the objects are AGNs. Their optical and X-ray properties (derived from the spectra… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
109
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
27
109
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We used two power-laws with the same photon index fixed to Γ = 1.9 (Reeves & Turner 2000;Caccianiga et al 2004;Page et al 2004) to model the scattered and the primary X-ray emission. While the scattering component was absorbed only through the Galactic column density, we estimated an intrinsic column density that absorbs the primary X-ray emission of N H = (4 ± 2) × 10 23 cm −2 (χ 2 /d.o.f.…”
Section: Xmm-newton Archival Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used two power-laws with the same photon index fixed to Γ = 1.9 (Reeves & Turner 2000;Caccianiga et al 2004;Page et al 2004) to model the scattered and the primary X-ray emission. While the scattering component was absorbed only through the Galactic column density, we estimated an intrinsic column density that absorbs the primary X-ray emission of N H = (4 ± 2) × 10 23 cm −2 (χ 2 /d.o.f.…”
Section: Xmm-newton Archival Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 is probably the best place where to look for Compton Thin QSO2; as shown in (e.g. Caccianiga et al 2004) the very positive HR2 reflects the relatively large intrinsic photoelectric absorption present in many QSO2 and responsible for their preferential discovery in hard X-ray surveys 6 . 6 We caution however that the separation in HR2 properties between Compton Thin and Compton Thick QSO2 is probably clear only for sources with redshift as high as in our learning sample (z <∼ 0.8); at Finally, we show in Fig.…”
Section: Fig 8 Left Panelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…X-ray selection looks instead for luminous (L X,2−10 keV > 10 44 erg/s) significantly obscured (column density N H > 10 22 cm −2 ) sources, which are best selected in the E > 2 keV hard X-ray band (e.g. Mainieri et al 2002;Caccianiga et al 2004;Perola et al 2004;Vignali et al 2006;Della Ceca et al 2008;Krumpe et al 2008). Within the Unified Model (Antonucci 1993), obscuration of the central X-ray-emitting and Broad Line-emitting regions by an intervening torus gives rise to those consistent properties across both bands.…”
Section: Searching For Qso2 Candidatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We define EXO50 the sources with f x / f o > 50; these are a rare class of X-ray emitting objects, as typically AGN have f x / f o = 1-10 (see e.g. Caccianiga et al 2004, Della Ceca et al 2004, Civano et al 2012. For instance, in the XMM-Newton Bright Survey (XBS, Della Ceca et al 2004, Caccianiga et al 2008), a complete sample of bright ( f (0.5−4.5keV) 7 × 10 −14 erg cm −2 s −1 ) X-ray selected sources almost completely identified (spectroscopic identification level ∼ 98%), EXO50 objects represents only ∼ 0.5% of the source population.…”
Section: The Exo50 Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1), population, namely those sources with f x / f o >50 (more than 15 times the average values of unobscured broad line AGN, e.g. Caccianiga et al 2004, Della Ceca et al 2004, Civano et al 2012 and with f x > 10 −13 erg cm −2 s −1 . In this way we should efficiently select the best candidates to be obscured QSOs; at the same time, the source brightness ensures that the optical spectroscopic identification can be achieved 1 for sources with reasonably good quality X-ray data (>few hundred counts) to carry out a reliable X-ray spectral analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%