1989
DOI: 10.1101/gad.3.11.1779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Xenopus ribosomal gene enhancers bind an essential polymerase I transcription factor, xUBF.

Abstract: We purified xUBF on the basis of its ability to specifically bind the enhancer elements of the Xenopus laevis rRNA genes. xUBF also binds to both upstream and downstream regions of the X. laevis ribosomal gene promoter and is essential for polymerase I transcription. Unexpectedly, xUBF binds to both upstream and downstream regions of the human ribosomal gene promoter, producing footprints that are indistinguishable from the footprints produced by hUBF, a previously described polymerase I transcription factor i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

5
162
1
1

Year Published

1990
1990
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
162
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the natural enhancer, the fifteen nucleotide region that was randomized is 80% GC rich, whereas the selected sequences from the random oligo population averaged 42% G+C. This was surprising given our preconception that UBF has a preference for GC rich DNA, a bias stemming from the sensitivity of UBF to competition by poly (dI-dC)poly (dI-dC), but its relative insensitivity to poly (dA-dT) poly (dA-dT) (12,37). We considered the possibility that a UBF recognition site might be located outside of the randomized region of the probe population tested, or even outside of the footprinted region.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the natural enhancer, the fifteen nucleotide region that was randomized is 80% GC rich, whereas the selected sequences from the random oligo population averaged 42% G+C. This was surprising given our preconception that UBF has a preference for GC rich DNA, a bias stemming from the sensitivity of UBF to competition by poly (dI-dC)poly (dI-dC), but its relative insensitivity to poly (dA-dT) poly (dA-dT) (12,37). We considered the possibility that a UBF recognition site might be located outside of the randomized region of the probe population tested, or even outside of the footprinted region.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…These include Xenopus and mouse enhancers and ribosomal gene promoter domains from Xenopus, human, rat and mouse (discussed in 12, 37). Nonetheless, UBF from all vertebrate species tested produces essentially identical footprints on various promoter or enhancer probes suggesting that vertebrate UBFs recognize DNA in the same way (7,(12)(13)(14)33). To reconcile these observations it has been suggested that the structure of ribosomal gene promoters may have been conserved in evolution without primary sequence conservation (12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations