2012
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The X-ray variability history of Markarian 3

Abstract: Context. The unified scenario for active galactic nuclei (AGN) postulates that our orientation with respect to a parsec-scale azimuthally-symmetric gas and dust system causes the difference in their phenomenology in the optical/UV and X-ray bands. Only recently have high-resolution radio (VLBI) and IR interferometric observations provided direct constraints on the size and structure of this obscuring system (known historically as the "torus"). On the other hand, variability in optically-thick X-ray absorption … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(98 reference statements)
5
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among them, variations are found only in MARK 3, which was previously classified as a Compton-thick candidate Goulding et al 2012), with a column density of 1.1 × 10 24 cm −2 measured by BeppoSAX (Cappi et al 1999). In fact, variations in MARK 3 have already been reported by Guainazzi et al (2012), who studied its variability using XMM-Newton, Suzaku, and Swift data, and found variations on timescales of months. We found that the changes in MARK 3 are related to Norm 2 , i.e., intrinsic to the source.…”
Section: Compton-thicknessmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among them, variations are found only in MARK 3, which was previously classified as a Compton-thick candidate Goulding et al 2012), with a column density of 1.1 × 10 24 cm −2 measured by BeppoSAX (Cappi et al 1999). In fact, variations in MARK 3 have already been reported by Guainazzi et al (2012), who studied its variability using XMM-Newton, Suzaku, and Swift data, and found variations on timescales of months. We found that the changes in MARK 3 are related to Norm 2 , i.e., intrinsic to the source.…”
Section: Compton-thicknessmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…This nucleus is also included in the present sample, but variations are not found here, mainly because we did not use two of the observations included in the work of Paggi et al (2012) since they were affected by a pileup fraction higher than 10%. Guainazzi et al (2012) speculate that variations at soft X-ray energies in MARK 3 may be present when comparing XMM-Newton and Swift data, but confirmation is still required. They argue that these variations are most probably due to cross-calibration uncertainties between the instruments, but if true, soft X-ray variations could be related to the innermost part of the narrow-line region.…”
Section: Variations At Soft Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bauer et al (2015) recently confirmed this result, using NuSTAR, by spectrally discriminating three neutral reflectors, which differently contribute to the iron Kα and Compton hump emission. Other Compton-thick sources have been used to map the extended iron Kα emission line: Mrk 3 (Guainazzi et al 2012(Guainazzi et al , 2016, Circinus (Marinucci et al 2013) and they all indicate that reflecting material may extend on scales ranging from tens to thousands of parsecs. In particular, the last source showed a spatially variable Equivalent Width of the iron Kα which strongly resembles the one that we have presented for NGC 4945.…”
Section: Equivalent Width Of the Iron Kα Linementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molendi, Bianchi & Matt 2003;Arévalo et al 2014) and Mrk 3 (e.g. Bianchi et al 2005b;Pounds & Page 2005;Guainazzi et al 2012Guainazzi et al , 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%