The Messenger Mission to Mercury 2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-77214-1_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The X-ray Spectrometer on the MESSENGER Spacecraft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In short, the count rate is derived from the ACS's response integrated over its omnidirectional field of view, large geometric factor, particle species (energetic electrons, GCRs, and planetary neutrons), and particle energy. While the Energetic Particle Spectrometer (3 s resolution) (Andrews et al, ), X‐Ray Spectrometer (XRS, 40 s resolution) (Schlemm et al, ), and Neutron Spectrometer (NS, 20 s resolution) (Goldsten et al, ) instruments also observe energetic electrons, we focus on GRS observations because of the sensor's superior time resolution and its high sensitivity from its nearly omnidirectional response and large geometric factor. For simplicity, we use “GRS” to refer to the high‐time‐resolution ACS measurements except where noted otherwise.…”
Section: Data Sources and Event Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short, the count rate is derived from the ACS's response integrated over its omnidirectional field of view, large geometric factor, particle species (energetic electrons, GCRs, and planetary neutrons), and particle energy. While the Energetic Particle Spectrometer (3 s resolution) (Andrews et al, ), X‐Ray Spectrometer (XRS, 40 s resolution) (Schlemm et al, ), and Neutron Spectrometer (NS, 20 s resolution) (Goldsten et al, ) instruments also observe energetic electrons, we focus on GRS observations because of the sensor's superior time resolution and its high sensitivity from its nearly omnidirectional response and large geometric factor. For simplicity, we use “GRS” to refer to the high‐time‐resolution ACS measurements except where noted otherwise.…”
Section: Data Sources and Event Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the time of the solar flare in question, MESSENGER was at about 0.48 AU and 153°E relative to the Earth‐Sun line. Instruments aboard MESSENGER observed the flare through its signatures in 1–8 keV X‐rays [ Schlemm et al , 2007], electrons (and perhaps some ions) at energies between 65 keV and 1 MeV [ Andrews et al , 2007], characteristic variations in the IMF [ Anderson et al , 2007], and neutrons having apparent energies deposited in the NS between 0 and 7.5 MeV [ Goldsten et al , 2007]. No measurements of gamma rays are available during the 31 December 2007 event because the MESSENGER GRS was not turned on at the time.…”
Section: Observations By Messengermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During MESSENGER's four years in orbit, measurements made by its suite of geochemistry instruments—the X‐Ray Spectrometer (XRS) and Gamma Ray and Neutron Spectrometer (GRNS)—revealed the composition of a previously poorly constrained surface [ Nittler et al ., ; Peplowski et al ., , , , , ; Evans et al ., ; L. G. Evans et al , ; Starr et al ., ; Weider et al ., , ; Lawrence et al ., , ]. The highest resolution chemical maps are derived from the XRS, which detected the abundances of Mg, Al, Si, S, Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, and Fe in the top few tens of microns of Mercury's surface [ Schlemm et al ., ]. The XRS revealed a surface that is intermediate in Mg/Si between terrestrial and lunar komatiites and basalts and the terrestrial oceanic crust but has lower Al/Si and Ca/Si than those basalts [ Nittler et al ., ; Weider et al ., , , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%