The wrong bin bag: A turn to ontology in science and technology studies?

Abstract

There is in science and technology studies a perceptible new interest in matters of ‘ontology’. Until recently, the term ‘ontology’ had been sparingly used in the field. Now it appears to have acquired a new theoretical significance and lies at the centre of many programmes of empirical investigation. The special issue to which this essay is a contribution gathers a series of enquiries into the ontological and reflects, collectively, on the value of the analytical and methodological sensibilities that underpin this new approach to the make-up of the world. To what extent and in what sense can we speak of a ‘turn to ontology’ in science and technology studies? What should we make of, and with, this renewed interest in matters of ontology? This essay offers some preliminary responses to these questions. First, we examine claims of a shift from epistemology to ontology and explore in particular the implications of the notion of ‘enactment’. This leads to a consideration of the normative implications of approaches that bring ‘ontological politics’ to centre stage. We then illustrate and pursue these questions by using an example – the case of the ‘wrong bin bag’. We conclude with a tentative assessment of the prospects for ontologically sensitive science and technology studies.

<b>Amphibious Worlds: Environments, Infrastructures, Ontologies</b>

“…Not least, it has recently come to the forefront of debate in both science and technology studies (Gad, Jensen and Winthereik 2015;Woolgar and Lezaun 2013) and anthropology (Viveiros de Castro 2011). Seeing ontologies as emergent and open-ended relational patterns, these approaches are equidistant from perspectives that prioritize purely social relations and from those that search for analytical ground in the natural properties, or affordances, of objects.…”

Brave New World: Eugenics, Discipline Formation, and the Biosocial

“…Finally, and within the academy, what might the coming together of the biological and the social mean for disciplinary formations (Fitzgerald & Callard 2015) and social theory (Warin et al 2016)? Here, biosocial discussion fits within a broader 'turn to ontology' (Woolgar & Lezaun 2013) or 'new materialism' which questions and incorporates both matter and discourse (Barad 2007). Amongst social science disciplines this debate arguably holds particular significance for STS as it resonates with long standing disputes within the field: Biosocial science, we might suggest, represents a decisive opportunity to finally throw the discursive baby out with the Bath School (Callon & Latour 1992).…”

Debtor publics: tracking the participatory politics of consumer credit

“…Furthermore, the "troubles" that prompt the formation of publics may ontological rather than epistemological in character (see Marres 2012;Mol 2002;Woolgar and Lezaun 2013). The routine life of default bears witness to this: it is an intimate, embodied experience in which the sense of life being out of balance emerges in particular from the intrusion of debt collection devices into the home (see Deville 2015).…”