2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The worst of both worlds—combined deliveries in twin gestations: a subanalysis of the Twin Birth Study, a randomized, controlled, prospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
14
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our rate of combined delivery is in agreement with previous retrospective data and recent sub-analyses of the TBS, concluding that non-cephalic presentation of the second twin is a strong risk factor for combined delivery. [24][25][26][27] Unlike the outlined studies, we also described that this adverse event was associated with an extended second stage of labor. Taken together, and acknowledging that the majority of women who crossed the 2 h point will ultimately experience a vaginal delivery, we suggest that 2 h into the second stage should be considered as a point in time that requires reassessment of labor progression, and as a consequence a shared decision about the recommended mode of delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Our rate of combined delivery is in agreement with previous retrospective data and recent sub-analyses of the TBS, concluding that non-cephalic presentation of the second twin is a strong risk factor for combined delivery. [24][25][26][27] Unlike the outlined studies, we also described that this adverse event was associated with an extended second stage of labor. Taken together, and acknowledging that the majority of women who crossed the 2 h point will ultimately experience a vaginal delivery, we suggest that 2 h into the second stage should be considered as a point in time that requires reassessment of labor progression, and as a consequence a shared decision about the recommended mode of delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…[35][36][37] A recent subanalysis of the Twin Birth Study had a conversion rate of 7%, similar to that of our institution which we used in our basecase scenario. 13 Very few cost-effectiveness analyses have been performed on twin VDs, especially analyzing delivery in the LDR versus OR. One prior study from Mauldin et al in 1998 analyzed delivery management of a nonvertex second twin and found that breech extraction of the second twin was more cost effective than external cephalic version or primary CD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Aviram et al did report higher rates of morbidity in twin B as compared with twin A, though they warn that the overall prevalence of adverse outcome was low; thus, caution should be taken in drawing practical implications from these results. 12 Multifetal gestations have been shown to require significantly higher health care resources and cost as compared with singleton pregnancies. 5,23 With the consistent rise of twin pregnancies in recent years, one must consider the costs associated with twin deliveries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%