1978
DOI: 10.2307/3866659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The World Trade Model: Merchandise Trade

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this demand-side interpretation still requires the presence of sunk costs and an initial e overvaluation in order to trigger entry. 576 BOB ANDERTON foreign firm in an imperfectly competitive market as in Mastropasqua and Vona (1989), Deppler and Ripley (1978) and Spencer (1984). Under certain assumptions the long-run values of i1 and i2 will sum to one.…”
Section: Import Pricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this demand-side interpretation still requires the presence of sunk costs and an initial e overvaluation in order to trigger entry. 576 BOB ANDERTON foreign firm in an imperfectly competitive market as in Mastropasqua and Vona (1989), Deppler and Ripley (1978) and Spencer (1984). Under certain assumptions the long-run values of i1 and i2 will sum to one.…”
Section: Import Pricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 The import and export volume equations that are used in this paper correspond fairly closely to those of the Fund's World Trade Model (Deppler and Ripley (1978)) and follow the approach suggested by Armington (1969). No time series have been collected on U. S. manufacturing exports from the parent company to its overseas affiliates and on total imports by the affiliates in each of the industrial countries.…”
Section: A Simple Model Of Conventional and Intrafirmmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…(The choice of data is discussed in more detaii below.) This is the standard formulation of export price equations in the literature, and an interesting theoretical rationale is provided by Deppler and Ripley (1978). They show that (1) can be regarded ; 1 9 a reduced form price equation for a profit-maximising firm which is subject to (a) diminishing returns to scale because capital is fixed in the short run; (b) perfect competition in the markets for the variable factors of production; and (c) less than perfect competition in the market €or the firm's output.…”
Section: Uv = F(pw Pd U )mentioning
confidence: 99%