The World Peace Foundation

Ginn, Edwin

doi:10.1177/002205741107301703

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…He eventually abandoned the peace school idea and took up the cause of world federalism as the solution to war. Ginn (1911), like many of the other world federalists discussed here, argued for a series of international institutions, including an International Supreme Court, International Executive, International Parliament and, perhaps most controversially, an International Police Force. However, in addition to these institutional features Ginn argued that an international sense of community, or feeling of world citizenship, was necessary to persuade states to participate in this type of system.…”

Section: Social Darwinismmentioning

confidence: 79%

Progress, History and Identity in International Relations Theory: The Case of the Idealist-Realist Debate

Thies

2002

European Journal of International Relations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article examines the link between disciplinary identity formation, history creation and progress by undertaking an excavation of the idealist-realist debate in International Relations theory. I demonstrate how the debate was framed by the realists, who constructed a unified `idealism' temporally located in the interwar period to be the straw man for the justification of their theories and the starting point for construction of the realist identity. The unified paradigm of `idealism' turns out to be a multiplicity of discourses running throughout the first half of the 20th century. As those discourses intersected with `utopian' realism, two in particular became central to realist identity. The world federalism discourse became the unacknowledged, implicit goal of realism as the realists simultaneously constructed it as the explicit and sole goal of the `idealists'. The sovereignty/anarchy discourse became the lived ideal made real through power for the realists who suppressed any mention of this discourse during the `idealist', `interwar' years. I argue that the appropriation of these two discourses by realism is the reason that the narrative history of the discipline requires us to forever remember realism's progressive victory over `idealism' in the First Great Debate.

show abstract

Section: Social Darwinismmentioning

confidence: 79%

Progress, History and Identity in International Relations Theory: The Case of the Idealist-Realist Debate

Thies

2002

European Journal of International Relations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The World Peace Foundation

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Progress, History and Identity in International Relations Theory: The Case of the Idealist-Realist Debate

Progress, History and Identity in International Relations Theory: The Case of the Idealist-Realist Debate

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About