The World Bank: Development, Poverty, Hegemony

Thomas, David P.

doi:10.1080/03056240903211364

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The choice of the words "Absolute" and "Reductions" are deliberately provocative, reflecting the growing body of scientific assessments (IPCC, 2014;Rothman et al, 2009;UNEP, 2007UNEP, , 2012Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005) demonstrating that current approaches to sustainability, characterised by efficiency improvements, relative decoupling, and green consumerism alone are insufficient. Sustainability measures are being determined by whims of the current market economy (Simms, Johnson, & Chowla, 2010;Thomas, 2009) and tend to ignore the real prospects of an ecological collapse that threatens the wellbeing of vulnerable groups and ultimately global society. When government policy makers have addressed unsustainability, it has tended to rely on technology, which has been shown to be an insufficient remedy on its own, or on consumer scapegoatism (Akenji, 2014;Eriksson, 2004), by urging consumers to buy green products rather than by addressing the fundamental problems of the current systems of production and consumption.…”

Section: Introduction: the Magnitude Scope And Urgency Of The Sustaimentioning

confidence: 99%

Ossified materialism: introduction to the special volume on absolute reductions in materials throughput and emissions

Akenji

Bengtsson

Bleischwitz

et al. 2016

Journal of Cleaner Production

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Drawing from papers in this special volume (SV), this introductory paper on absolute reductions argues that the magnitude, scope and urgency of the sustainability challenge require a drastic change in global civilisation, including a radical transformation of the institutional arrangements and socio-technical systems that facilitate the pursuit of wellbeing. The authors of this paper identify four main challenges to absolute reductions, including: the resource-intensive conventional template for development, macroeconomic structures and trade policies creating burden-shifting and inequality, a resource-efficiency improvements fallacy, and the dominant consumerist culture and lifestyles. The paper demonstrates the complexity of translating planetary boundaries into boundaries for resource use and targets for absolute reductions, proposing a practical approach starting with defining footprints for water, land and materials, and then proceeding to set resource boundaries. In seeking potential solutions, the paper highlights research addressing materials and product substitution, ecological fiscal reform with measures such as carbon taxation, sustainable lifestyles, design for sustainability, eco-innovation, and management of power dynamics in the production-consumption system. We then propose six domains in a research agenda for future research. These include: moving from niches and demonstration projects to broader norms; addressing reductions targets and indicators to guide policy and action; including policy design reflecting complexities such as time-lags, the resource nexus, and positive feedback loops; global resource governance; and convergence pathways between overconsuming and under-consuming societies. These areas will provide the science that will inform policy and business decisions and guide the engagement of practitioners to work towards sustainability transitions to equitable, sustainable, post-fossil carbon societies.

show abstract