Star Carr Volume II 2018
DOI: 10.22599/book2.u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Worked Flint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, p. xx-xx DOI: https://doi.org/10.2218/jls.2892 making this distinction for the RPAS assemblage, but the possibility exists following further excavation to increase the sample size. Further, the assemblage seems to show some similarities with the Star Carr assemblage as described by Conneller et al (2018;see also Pitts & Jacobi 1979;Reyner 2005;Saville 2004). The blade production in RPAS Concept 2 technology differs in its basic strategies from those of RPAS Concept 1, as well as those used within the Final Palaeolithic and Early Mesolithic of northwest Europe, and the Middle and Late Mesolithic of northwest continental Europe (Berg-Hansen 2017; 2018; Damlien 2016; Damlien et al 2018;David & Sørensen 2016;Sørensen 2006b;Sørensen et al 2013).…”
Section: Comparisonssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…1, p. xx-xx DOI: https://doi.org/10.2218/jls.2892 making this distinction for the RPAS assemblage, but the possibility exists following further excavation to increase the sample size. Further, the assemblage seems to show some similarities with the Star Carr assemblage as described by Conneller et al (2018;see also Pitts & Jacobi 1979;Reyner 2005;Saville 2004). The blade production in RPAS Concept 2 technology differs in its basic strategies from those of RPAS Concept 1, as well as those used within the Final Palaeolithic and Early Mesolithic of northwest Europe, and the Middle and Late Mesolithic of northwest continental Europe (Berg-Hansen 2017; 2018; Damlien 2016; Damlien et al 2018;David & Sørensen 2016;Sørensen 2006b;Sørensen et al 2013).…”
Section: Comparisonssupporting
confidence: 57%