2006
DOI: 10.1144/gsl.sp.2006.259.01.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Wonji fault belt (Main Ethiopian Rift): structural and geomorphological constraints and GPS monitoring

Abstract: The Wonji Fault Belt (WFB), Main Ethiopian Rift, forms a network of faults oriented NNE-SSW with a Quaternary direction of extension oriented c. N95° E. Faults are spaced between 0.5 and 2 km, show a fresh steep scarp, recent activity and slip rates of up to 2.0 mm a−1. This high value of deformation along the rift floor with respect to the plate separation rates suggests that most of the active strain could be accommodated by magma-induced faulting within the rift. However, the mountain front morphology assoc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
48
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
6
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern of strain is consistent with the broad zone of collapse calderas and faults observed at the surface (e.g. Pizzi et al, 2006). Further north in the FentaleDofen magmatic segment, seismicity along the rift axis is predominantly concentrated at 9-14 km depth within a narrower (30 km wide) axial graben that is coincident with a 20-30 km-wide zone of mafic intrusions.…”
Section: Comparison With Ethiopian Rift Deformation Patternssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This pattern of strain is consistent with the broad zone of collapse calderas and faults observed at the surface (e.g. Pizzi et al, 2006). Further north in the FentaleDofen magmatic segment, seismicity along the rift axis is predominantly concentrated at 9-14 km depth within a narrower (30 km wide) axial graben that is coincident with a 20-30 km-wide zone of mafic intrusions.…”
Section: Comparison With Ethiopian Rift Deformation Patternssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Fernandes et al (2004) predict 6-7 mm/yr opening in a direction N95 ± 5, compared to ∼ 20 mm/yr at N50 in the southernmost Red Sea (Vigny et al, 2006). Pizzi et al (2006) found an extension direction of N95. Keir et al (2006) estimated an extension direction of N103 ± 12 from an inversion of focal mechanism solutions for tectonic earthquakes, which is similar to the N109 opening direction from a single geodetic profile across the rift (Bilham et al, 1999).…”
Section: Tectonic Settingmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since 11 Ma the northern part of the MER was already opening out into the stretched Afar depression (Hendrie et al, 1994;Tesfaye et al, 2003;Wolfenden et al, 2004). Generally, the MER opened at a rate of about 2.5 to 5 mm/a in ESE-WNW direction during Miocene to Pliocene times (Wolfenden et al, 2004), whereby large, discontinuous normal border faults developed (Pizzi et al, 2006;Tesfaye et al, 2008). Subsequently, continuous rift extension focused on newly developed magmatic segments of Quaternary age (Ebinger and Casey, 2001;Casey et al, 2006;Keir et al, 2006;Corti, 2009) which were connected with coeval rift basins, interpreted as embryonic oceanic spreading centres (Hayward and Ebinger, 1996;Manighetti et al, 1998;Ebinger and Casey, 2001).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With an average width of about 70 km, it is the narrowest part of the Ethiopian rift system (e.g., Beyene & Abdelsalam 2005). It is bordered by discontinuous series of large, vertical to sub-vertical Miocene aged normal faults (Pizzi et al 2006). The main rift is dotted with a series of Quaternary rift basins where current rift extension and both basaltic and silicic magmatism is focused (Hayward & Ebinger 1996).…”
Section: Geomorphological Setting Of Ethiopiamentioning
confidence: 99%